Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

An employee made a 5% deferral rate election effective January 1, 2020; however, due to a mistake in plan operation, this 5% deferral rate was never implemented. This would likely be classified as the "failure to implement an employee's election" for an entire plan year as described in Appendix A.05(5)(a) of Revenue Procedure 2021-30. The Rev Proc states that:

"...the Plan Sponsor must make a QNEC to the plan on behalf of the employee to replace the “missed deferral opportunity.” The missed deferral opportunity is equal to 50 percent of the employee’s “missed deferral.” The missed deferral is determined by multiplying the employee’s elected deferral percentage by the employee’s compensation."

The plan sponsor normally allows employees to make 401(k) contributions on compensation in excess of the 401(a)(17) compensation limit of $285,000 for the 2020 year (as permitted by IRS Employee Plan News Issue 2012-1). The employee's compensation for the 2020 plan year was $340,000. My question is....is the "compensation" used in calculating the missed deferral $285,000 or $340,000?

As best as I can tell, the Rev Proc does not say that compensation under the corrections in Appendix A or B must limited to the 401(a)(17) limit, and quite frankly, if the plan had been operated correctly, the participant would have had the 5% deferral rate applied to the full $340,000 of compensation. Thoughts?

Posted

Yes, use $340k.  But be mindful of the 402(g) limit and catchups.  So the QNEC is limited to $9,750 (plus $3,250 c/u) no matter what the compensation.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

I could be wrong, but I know of no application of Compensation which is not limited to the 401(a)(17) limit.  Look at your plan document's definition.

See irs.gov/retirement-plans/401k-plan-fix-it guide-you-did-not-use-the-plans-definition-of-compensation-correctly-for-all-deferrals-and-allocations.

PNJ

Patricia Neal Jensen, JD

Vice President and Nonprofit Practice Leader

|Future Plan, an Ascensus Company

21031 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor

Woodland Hills, CA 91364

E patricia.jensen@futureplan.com

P 949-325-6727

Posted

Does this plan’s administration permit a participant to specify her within-a-year elective-deferral salary reductions as a percentage of each pay period’s actual wages, unconstrained by a § 401(a)(17) limit (but subject to stopping or lowering a periodic salary reduction so the sum remains within § 401(a)(17), § 402(g), and other limits and constraints)?

For a correction, might one treat an election of 5.00% of $340,000 (if the plan allowed that) as an election of 5.96% of $285,000?

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use