Jump to content

New Plan, definition of comp <> comp used => correction


Recommended Posts

Posted

Plan set up beginning of last year with a certain definition of compensation.

On payroll, a different definition of compensation was used.

To what extent can plan be amended retroactively to match what has been done in practice (ie self-correction)?

Posted

I think with the new EPCRS, there is much more latitude with retroactive amendments.  Just be cognizant of who may be benefiting versus who may get a cutback of sorts.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted
7 hours ago, TPApril said:

Plan set up beginning of last year with a certain definition of compensation.

On payroll, a different definition of compensation was used.

To what extent can plan be amended retroactively to match what has been done in practice (ie self-correction)?

is there an employer match? was the definition used by payroll more or less liberal?

Posted

Even under the most recent EPCRS, an operational failure still can only be corrected by a retroactive amendment to conform to prior plan operations if it results in an increase of a benefit, right, or feature. See 4.05(2)(a)(i).

The update removed the requirement that the amendment provide an increase in BRF to all participants in the plan, which was the challenging part, but still requires an increase in BRF for those affected by the operational failure.

So if the definition of compensation actually used was less than the definition of compensation in the plan document, I still think you would need to correct with additional contributions or use VCP to amend retroactively. 

Posted

Excellent points as always, I should have included that using the payroll version of comp vs the plan doc definition of comp is more beneficial to all employees.  There would be no additional contributions or corrrective withdrawals. If they go with plan doc def some money would have to be pulled from the match.

Posted

 See irs.gov/retirement-plans/401k-plan-fix-it guide-you-did-not-use-the-plans-definition-of-compensation-correctly-for-all-deferrals-and-allocations.

Patricia Neal Jensen, JD

Vice President and Nonprofit Practice Leader

|Future Plan, an Ascensus Company

21031 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor

Woodland Hills, CA 91364

E patricia.jensen@futureplan.com

P 949-325-6727

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use