TPApril Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 Plan set up beginning of last year with a certain definition of compensation. On payroll, a different definition of compensation was used. To what extent can plan be amended retroactively to match what has been done in practice (ie self-correction)?
BG5150 Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 I think with the new EPCRS, there is much more latitude with retroactive amendments. Just be cognizant of who may be benefiting versus who may get a cutback of sorts. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
mattmc82 Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 7 hours ago, TPApril said: Plan set up beginning of last year with a certain definition of compensation. On payroll, a different definition of compensation was used. To what extent can plan be amended retroactively to match what has been done in practice (ie self-correction)? is there an employer match? was the definition used by payroll more or less liberal?
EBECatty Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 Even under the most recent EPCRS, an operational failure still can only be corrected by a retroactive amendment to conform to prior plan operations if it results in an increase of a benefit, right, or feature. See 4.05(2)(a)(i). The update removed the requirement that the amendment provide an increase in BRF to all participants in the plan, which was the challenging part, but still requires an increase in BRF for those affected by the operational failure. So if the definition of compensation actually used was less than the definition of compensation in the plan document, I still think you would need to correct with additional contributions or use VCP to amend retroactively.
TPApril Posted August 13, 2021 Author Posted August 13, 2021 Excellent points as always, I should have included that using the payroll version of comp vs the plan doc definition of comp is more beneficial to all employees. There would be no additional contributions or corrrective withdrawals. If they go with plan doc def some money would have to be pulled from the match. Bill Presson 1
Patricia Neal Jensen Posted August 16, 2021 Posted August 16, 2021 See irs.gov/retirement-plans/401k-plan-fix-it guide-you-did-not-use-the-plans-definition-of-compensation-correctly-for-all-deferrals-and-allocations. Patricia Neal Jensen, JD Vice President and Nonprofit Practice Leader |Future Plan, an Ascensus Company 21031 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor Woodland Hills, CA 91364 E patricia.jensen@futureplan.com P 949-325-6727
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now