Biz Develop Consultant BJF Posted November 17, 2021 Posted November 17, 2021 Maybe it's the lack of coffee but I'm lacking confidence in my answer... We have a prospective client that is a controlled group and wants to set up separate Plans; they were hoping to avoid a SH option on Plan 2, which we advised is not permissible. So I was thinking SH match (100% on 4%) for Plan 1 and for Plan 2 QACA match. This provides SH benefits for both employers but a vesting schedule can be applied to Plan 2. Am I missing something...
C. B. Zeller Posted November 17, 2021 Posted November 17, 2021 Would both plans pass coverage if tested separately? If so, then you can do whatever you want, including using a non-safe harbor design for plan 2. If not, then you are out of luck. There is a rule that you cannot aggregate plans that use different methods of satisfying the ADP test, including different safe harbors. Luke Bailey 1 Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now