Penflyer Posted March 31, 2022 Posted March 31, 2022 Reviewing takeover plan docs from prior TPA. Document is 3 % safe harbor with cross test language. Definition of comp excludes bonuses. Plan passes comp discrimination test but Safe harbor was calculated on comp less bonus. I thought you had to use a 414s definition of comp for Safe Harbor. Am I wrong?
Bill Presson Posted March 31, 2022 Posted March 31, 2022 Excluding bonuses is considered reasonable within 414s if it doesn't by design discriminate in favor of HCEs. Passing the test shows that it doesn't. You're good to go. Here's a link if you want. Compensation definition Luke Bailey, Bri and Nate S 3 William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
Mike Preston Posted March 31, 2022 Posted March 31, 2022 Are you guys sure you're talking about the same test?
Penflyer Posted March 31, 2022 Author Posted March 31, 2022 I’m talking about the comp used for the safe harbor allocation only.
Nate S Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 On 3/31/2022 at 9:24 AM, Penflyer said: I’m talking about the comp used for the safe harbor allocation only. The takeover allocation was fine. You are thinking of the 414(s) safe harbor exclusions (excluding fringe benefits for example) which don't need to be tested to prove non-discrimination. Otherwise Bill has the right of it, any other exclusion that passes testing can be used for the allocation.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now