Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone have a sample notice they have seen / prepared that they are willing to share?  I assume some of the big providers have put something together...

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

I was working on something for our employers without Roth, and a notice for employees.  I've had plenty of clients ask me about it.  Then things came to a screeching halt in a little company meeting last week.

There is apparently an increasing push by powerful players to delay the Roth-ification of catch-up because payroll and recordkeeping systems aren't prepared to accommodate it by January 1, 2024.  And there's also that niggling argument that catch-up, in general, will be disallowed effective in 2024 due to the technical error in the SECURE 2.0 language . . . So, as seems to be the case with all things SECURE, we're "waiting for guidance."  Sigh. 

We are sitting tight for the moment.

 

Posted

Congress’s repeal before the statute’s applicability date seems unlikely. Among many reasons, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the revenue raised by SECURE 2022’s § 603 as $16.637 billion for fiscal years 2024-2032.

A July 19 letter asks the Treasury department for “transition relief.” In context and by implication, the letter asks for a year’s nonenforcement.

If the Internal Revenue Service declines to apply Internal Revenue Code of 1986 § 414(v)(7), it’s doubtful any taxpayer has constitutional standing to seek a court’s order commanding the IRS to enforce § 414(v)(7).

I don’t guess anything about whether the Treasury department might openly declare, or quietly set, a nonenforcement policy.

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Posted
12 hours ago, Peter Gulia said:

Congress’s repeal before the statute’s applicability date seems unlikely. Among many reasons, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the revenue raised by SECURE 2022’s § 603 as $16.637 billion for fiscal years 2024-2032.

I put it more in "pipe dream" territory than unlikely...

12 hours ago, Peter Gulia said:

I don’t guess anything about whether the Treasury department might openly declare, or quietly set, a nonenforcement policy.

I'll guess 🤔.  I think this is a big enough issue that they have to provide something that practitioners can rely on, even if its just a notice of nonenforcement.  

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use