Peter Gulia Posted December 13, 2023 Share Posted December 13, 2023 If a nongovernmental and nonchurch charitable organization prefers to make available voluntary-only wage-reduction arrangements to buy a contract with Internal Revenue Code § 403(b) Federal income tax treatment and do so without establishing or maintaining a plan that would be ERISA-governed, such an employer prefers to avoid discretionary decision-making. That includes avoiding discretion about whether a participant has a hardship withing the meaning of § 403(b)(7)(A)(i)(V) or § 403(b)(11)(B). Many public-school employers too prefer to avoid involvement in those decisions. Are 403(b) insurers and custodians allowing a participant to self-certify her hardship? Does allowing self-certification help remove not only an employer but also an insurer or custodian from discretionary decisions about hardships? What’s happening in the real world? Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now