Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So anyone who is 61, 61, 62 or 63 as of 12/31/2025 can do the super catchup for a total deferral of $34,750.  Is it that simple?  Anyone know why SECURE limited it to that odd age group?  

 

Thank you

Posted

The political speculation is that providing the bigger catch-up amount beyond 63-year-olds would result in more revenue loss than the appropriations bill then would bear.

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Posted
7 hours ago, 401king said:

Ages 60, 61, 62 or 63 at year-end.

Which stinks for someone turning 63 on 12/31/2024.  They go all of 2025 age 63 with the exception of one day.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Gilmore said:

Which stinks for someone turning 63 on 12/31/2024.  They go all of 2025 age 63 with the exception of one day.

Yes, but wouldn't their parents have gotten the tax deduction for having the kid born by year-end? 

Posted

For a greater age-based catch-up deferral amount that might be permitted because the participant is treated as age 60, 61, 62, or 63, the Internal Revenue Code refers to “an eligible participant who would attain age 60 but would not attain age 64 before the close of the taxable year[.]” I.R.C. § 414(v)(2)(B)(i) (emphasis added).


About Gilmore’s observation:


After the first few years § 414(v)(2)(B)(i) applies, its measure that burdens a participant who reaches age 64 by her taxable year’s close might have benefitted that participant who as a 59-year-old for most of a year enjoyed a greater age-based catch-up deferral amount because she then “would attain age 60 . . . before the close of [her] taxable year[.]” (I assume the participant’s taxable year is constant for opening and closing the 60-63 years.)


Yet, I could join a “This stinks!” chorus as one who aged out before the provision becomes applicable.
 

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Posted
14 hours ago, Peter Gulia said:

Yet, I could join a “This stinks!” chorus as one who aged out before the provision becomes applicable.
 

Ditto....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use