DDB BN Posted December 4, 2025 Posted December 4, 2025 Plan Sponsor has non-union and union compensated employees. Union compensation is excluded from the plan. One of the employees will have W-2 FICA wages of about $70,000 in non-union compensation for 2025 and W-2 FICA wages in union compensation of about $125,000 for 2025. Is the union compensation included to determine if the employee's compensation is over $150,000 for Roth catch up for 2026?
Peter Gulia Posted December 5, 2025 Posted December 5, 2025 Are both amounts paid by the same common-law employer? Or does the business divide union and nonunion jobs between two or more companies? Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
DDB BN Posted December 5, 2025 Author Posted December 5, 2025 There are 2 Corps in the controlled group. Employees of both Corporations receive union and non-union income. The W-2 they receive each year includes both and we back out the union comp for calculation of the SHM.
Peter Gulia Posted December 5, 2025 Posted December 5, 2025 If a participant has more than one common-law employer, 26 C.F.R. § 1.414(v)–2(b)(4) (not yet codified) sets detailed rules about whether one need not or may aggregate Social Security wages from two or more employers. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-09-16/pdf/2025-17865.pdf at pages 44549-44550 [pdf pages 23-24]. Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
DDB BN Posted December 5, 2025 Author Posted December 5, 2025 The employee earned non-union and union compensation from one employer. His W-2 from the one employer includes both non-union and union compensation. He did not receive any compensation from the other employer in 2025.
Peter Gulia Posted December 5, 2025 Posted December 5, 2025 If the employee will have about $195,000 in Social Security wages (box 3) on one 2025 Form W-2 wage report, that would make her a § 414(v)(7)-affected participant for 2026 (if she otherwise is eligible for an age-based catch-up). That a portion of the wages was from union labor does not by itself exclude that portion from § 414(v)(7)’s measure of Social Security wages. This is not advice to anyone. Jakyasar and R Griffith 2 Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now