notapensiongeek Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Company A and Company B each sponsor their own 401(k) plan. Both entities are owned 50/50 by Tommy and Cooper. Both plans have the same plan year (fiscal year-end), testing method (current year), and neither is a safe harbor plan. No employer contributions are made to either plan for the year in question. Plan A: Participants: Tommy and Cooper only (the only employees/participants) Plan B: Tommy and Cooper are employees of Company B (and eligible participants in Plan B) but do not make elective deferrals. There are 16 HCEs total (including Tommy and Cooper) There are 79 NHCEs eligible to participate (2 are otherwise excludable, 77 are not) How are these plans required to be tested for 410(b) coverage and ADP testing? Specifically: Are the two plans required to be aggregated for testing purposes due to common ownership/controlled group rules, or may they be tested separately? If aggregation is required, how does that affect coverage and ADP results in this fact pattern? If separate testing is permitted, under what circumstances would that apply? Are there any other issues or traps in this structure that we should be aware of? Thanks in advance for any insight.
Bri Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Well, even if you wanted to test them separately, Plan A has a 0% NHCE ratio (you do have to measure the entire controlled group's population) so you're going to have to aggregate them, first and foremost. John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now