James Matt Ullakko Posted April 30, 2001 Posted April 30, 2001 Due to some Third Party Administration testing tracking problems... A very small 401(k) Plan didn't perform ADP/ACP test for PYE 12/31/1999 -limitation year 1999. Test was performed for 1998 and 2000. ADP/ACP Test fails for 1999. If the corrective distribution for 1999 limitation year failure is made after 2000 plan year end, is IRS Rev. Proc. 98-22 the best option to correct? If so, does anyone have experience using this method "permitted plan sponsor self-correction of certain qualification failures" ??? Any help is much appreciated! Matt
MWeddell Posted May 1, 2001 Posted May 1, 2001 The place to start is Revenue Procedure 2001-17. The IRS has started to update the various compliance correction programs annually, and this is the most recent guidance. It's 90 pages long, including the appendices, so it'll take you a while to read and digest. You probably want to go through it and figure out whether your client qualifies for the Self-Correction Program.
Richard Anderson Posted May 1, 2001 Posted May 1, 2001 Also, if my memory is correct, if a calendar 99 year plan fails the ADP test and does not correct by distribution by the end of 2000, the only self correction method available is probably QNECs.
James Matt Ullakko Posted May 1, 2001 Author Posted May 1, 2001 Thanks for your responses. I'll hope that the plan can use the APRSC...
Guest Jim Kais Posted May 9, 2001 Posted May 9, 2001 Obviously, check 2001-17, but typically, the client could fund either a '1 to 1 qnec' and distribute the excesses to the HCEs in the current year (there will be a 10% excise tax as well) OR they could fund a full QNEC (much more expensive).
MWeddell Posted May 9, 2001 Posted May 9, 2001 I agree with the prior post. However, the full QNEC could be allocated in a bottom up fashion, so it MIGHT not be as expensive as the previous post implies. I don't think we've got enough demographic information to tell you which correction method is best.
Guest Jim Kais Posted May 9, 2001 Posted May 9, 2001 MWeddell - Absolutely, we do not have the demographics to make any plan specific commentary. As a side note, however, my recollection of 2001-17 leads me to believe that a bottom up QNEC was not an allowable corrective measure.
James Matt Ullakko Posted May 9, 2001 Author Posted May 9, 2001 Thank you both for your help on this. I think the 1 to 1 QNEC with the HCE excess being distributed is the route we'll probably take. I have one more question about the 10% excise tax. I read that the time requirement to file Form 5330 is 3/15 following the regulatory correction period of 12 months following plan year end tested. For example, 1999 testing failures corrected October 2000 using 1 to 1 QNEC and distributing excesses to HCE's would require 10% excise tax to be filed prior to 3/15/2001. What if you make distributions to HCE's after 12 month correction period and do not file 2000 Form 5330 prior to 3/15/2001? Do you then file these excise tax amounts on the following year's 2001 Form 5330? Thanks, Matt
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.