Featured Jobs
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Mid Atlantic July Business Services
|
|
Internal Channel Sales Team Lead July Business Services
|
|
Director, Strategic Accounts and Channel Development July Business Services
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Heartland July Business Services
|
|
Experienced Employee Benefits Attorney Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
Director of Regulatory Operations and Compliance PCS Retirement
|
|
Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial)
|
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
Stones River Consulting
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Relationship Manager – Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
| Webinars and Podcasts |
> | Upcoming | On-Demand |
| Conferences | > | Upcoming | Grouped by Location |
| All Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences | > | Upcoming | Grouped by Sponsor |
View More Epstein Becker Green Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences
What’s New for Insurers in Mental Health Parity ComplianceEpstein Becker Green |
|
June 10, 2021 On-Demand Podcast |
|
In this episode of the Diagnosing Health Care Podcast: The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury jointly released a set of frequently asked questions (“FAQs”) related to recent changes made to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act effective as of February 10, 2021, and enacted by the Consolidated Appropriations Act at the end of 2020. Accordingly, health plans and insurers must ensure that they understand, and are prepared to provide regulators with documentation of their compliance with, parity requirements on at least a small group of specific non-quantitative treatment limits. Special guest Henry Harbin, MD, Health Care Consultant and former CEO of Magellan Health Services, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kevin Malone, David Shillcutt, and Tim Murphy discuss how stakeholders can gain key insights into the federal enforcement approach on parity from the new set of FAQs, including where the government might get the most return on investment for enforcement. |