WCC Posted April 12, 2023 Posted April 12, 2023 Maybe I should not ask "why", but here it goes: Is there a reason ages 73 and 75 were chosen for the RMD age? Was it based on: data around life expectancy, such as a specific life expectancy table a specific report that shows employees are working longer and delaying retirement anecdotal evidence balancing act with the budget and those ages just made the 10 year projections workout nicely moving from age 72 to 73 is the easiest change the drafters favorite numbers Thanks for any thoughts/comments.
Paul I Posted April 12, 2023 Posted April 12, 2023 Whatever reason that may be professed, the most likely is meeting the requirements for making the bill fit within fiscal parameters which are tied to a 10-year time frame. The same rationale applies to defining a High Paid person for purposes of mandating Roth catch-up contributions. Why $145,000 instead of the HCE limit? Roth catch-ups for High Paids at $145,000 was just enough of a revenue raiser. Bill Presson, Peter Gulia and Bri 2 1
Peter Gulia Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 The ten-year budget-reconciliation period for the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, of which SECURE 2022 is a division, is fiscal years 2023-2032—that is, October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2032. The change to age 75 applies “[i]n the case of an individual who attains age 74 after December 31, 2032[.]” Internal Revenue Code § 401(a)(9)(C)(v)(II). Someone born in 1960 would reach age 74 in 2034, age 75 in 2035, and might have a required beginning date as soon as April 1, 2036. For someone born in 1960, an applicable age of 73 would result in a required beginning date no sooner than April 1, 2034 and a first distribution calendar year no sooner than the year ended December 31, 2033—1¼ years after the budget-reconciliation period ends. While I haven’t read the whole report, I imagine the revenue estimators could have assumed the change to an applicable age of 75 for those born in 1960 and later would bear no revenue loss in the budget-reconciliation period ending September 30, 2032. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimate scored the combination of both increases in applicable age for a required beginning date as a revenue loss of only about $7 billion for fiscal years 2023-2032. JCX-21-22 2022-12-22.pdf Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
CuseFan Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 We can ponder what goes on inside the heads of politicians but those discussions are best had well into Friday happy hour! Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now