justanotheradmin Posted July 16, 2024 Posted July 16, 2024 Hi Everyone, I've read through this link but its an older one, and I just want to make sure I'm understanding it correctly for a plan's situation. Profit Sharing only plan - plan document specifies pro-rata allocation method, so I recognize it is relying on the allocation method safe harbor, rather than general testing, 401a4. Plan has a 1,000 hours and last day requirement, and most years there are a few part-time folks who are required to receive only the top heavy minimum. The 70% test does pass if those folks are included as benefiting. It does not if they are not counted as benefiting. Based on my reading of the link above - it sounds like I can't include them as benefiting? The plan document does not have the 410(b) fail safe language, so if allocation conditions need to be waived for anything other the top heavy min, a corrective amendment will be needed. Or, the plan would have to move on to more general testing and see if it passes, if it still doesn't pass, then then aforementioned amendment comes into play. Am I understanding this correctly? Do you include top heavy min only participants as benefiting in the regular ratio percentage test? I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say?
Bri Posted July 16, 2024 Posted July 16, 2024 I look at it as, you're not failing coverage, but rather you're failing nondiscrimination (or, at least, there's still work to be done), if you have less than 70% benefiting with a non-uniform formula but over 70% getting "at least something". Luke Bailey and Lou S. 2
justanotheradmin Posted July 16, 2024 Author Posted July 16, 2024 2 hours ago, Lou S. said: Is the PS contribution more than the 3% TH minimum? yes, it is more than 3%. I think the others are getting about 7%. I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say?
justanotheradmin Posted July 16, 2024 Author Posted July 16, 2024 2 hours ago, Bri said: I look at it as, you're not failing coverage, but rather you're failing nondiscrimination (or, at least, there's still work to be done), if you have less than 70% benefiting with a non-uniform formula but over 70% getting "at least something". that's a helpful way to frame it, thanks. Lou S. 1 I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say?
Lou S. Posted July 17, 2024 Posted July 17, 2024 Yes then to use an example if you have 1 HCE and 3 NHCs with the HCE and 2 NHCEs are getting 7% and one NHCE getting 3% they all are "benefiting" as they all got actual dollars. But if you are testing on a contribution basis then anyone getting less than 7% is not benefit for 401(a)(4) and your ratio would be less than 70%. So you can either test on a benefits basis and see if it passes (assuming you can pass all tests for this), you have fail safe language in the document which will pull in enough people at 7% to get to you to 70%, or if no fail safe an -(11)(g) amendment to pick an chose who gets the extra to get you to 70%. justanotheradmin and Luke Bailey 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now