Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

I'm currently working in PEP plan. My company A and another participating Employer Company is B. In the mid of the plan year (i.e., 12/31) employee transfer from company B to Company A on 6/20/2023.

In the company B for the period of 01/01/2023 to 06/20/2023, he had $90,000 and in company A, he earned $ 100,000 for the period of 06/21/2023 to 12/31/2023.

To determine HCE for 2024 plan year, which compensation  I have to take to determine HCE? Total compensation ($190,000) or company A compensation?

 

Posted

Take a look at IRM Part 7:

Exhibit 7.11.7-1

Specific Law Provisions and How They Apply to a Multiple Employer Plan

Code Section Must be Met by Multiple Employer Plan Must be Met by Each Participating Employer Authority
IRC 401(a) - Qualification requirements Yes   26 CFR 1.413-2(a)(3)(iv)
IRC 401(a) -Exclusive benefit rule Yes   IRC 413(c)(2) and Professional Employer Organization Rules in Rev. Proc. 2002-21
IRC 401(a)(4) - Nondiscrimination   Yes 26 CFR 1.413-2(a)(3)(iii) and 26 CFR 1.401(a)(4)-1(c)(4)
IRC 401(a)(26) - Minimum Participation (DB Plans)   Yes 26 CFR 1.401(a)(26)-2
IRC 401(k) /IRC 401(m) - ADP/ACP   Yes 26 CFR 1.401(k)-2(a)3(ii)(A) and 26 CFR 1.401(k)-1(b)(4)
IRC 404 - Deduction Adopted before 1989 Adopted after 1988 IRC 413(c)(6)
IRC 410(a) - Eligibility Yes   IRC 413(c)(1)
IRC 410(b) - Coverage   Yes 26 CFR 1.410(b)-7(c)(4)(i)(A) and 26 CFR 1.410(b)-7(c)(4)(ii)
IRC 411 - Vesting Yes   IRC 413(c)(3) and 26 CFR 1.413-2(d)
IRC 412 / IRC 430 - Funding Adopted before 1989 Adopted after 1988 IRC 413(c)(4)
26 CFR 1.414(l)-1 - Mergers or Transfer of Assets - see note below Yes   26 CFR 1.414(l)-1(b)(1)
IRC 414(q) - Definition of Highly Compensated Employee   Determination is made separately by each adopting employer 26 CFR 1.414(q)-1(T) Q&A-1
IRC 414(v) - Catch-up Contributions Yes   25 CFR 1.414(v)-1(f)
IRC 415 - Limitations on Benefits All compensation is included   26 CFR 1.415(a)-1(e)
IRC 416 - Top-Heavy   Yes 26 CFR 1.416-1, Q&A G-2 and T-8
Posted

You didn’t ask, but if this is a 401(k) plan and Company A and Company B are not under common control or properly treated as a single employer, are they related in a way that allows the plan to be exempt from registration under applicable securities laws? 

Posted

While this is beyond TH 401k’s question:

An interest in a retirement plan or its trust might be a security, and—absent an exemption, or a no-action letter—an issuer, offeror, or distributor of such a security (which might include a plan’s sponsor, administrator, trustee, or investment manager, and might include a participating employer) might need or want the security to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and other Federal and State securities laws.

Some exemptions might be available regarding a single-employer plan, but might not be available regarding a multiple-employer plan (including a pooled-employer plan).

Securities Act of 1933 § 3(a)(2), 15 U.S.C. § 77c(a)(2) http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:15 section:77c edition:prelim) OR (granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section77c)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true

Investment Company Act of 1940 § 3(c)(11), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-3(c)(11) http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:15 section:80a-3 edition:prelim) OR (granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section80a-3)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true

To sort out what is or isn’t a security and is or isn’t an exempt-from-registration security, get a securities lawyer’s advice.

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use