BG5150 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Plan has this elgibility: Age 20 1/2 1 YOS (1,000 hrs) Entry date: First day of plan year following. That's it. Ont he surface it seems it violated the 18 months rule, but I am half-remembering (probably incorrectly) that the age 20 1/2 somehow buys me an extra 6 months, but I can figure it out. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Belgarath Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 No, this isn't permissible. I believe you may be thinking about a plan that uses age 20-1/2 with a 6 month eligibility and a single entry date. That would be ok. But in the situation you have, a person might not enter until after the statutory entry date requirement.
BG5150 Posted March 9, 2018 Author Posted March 9, 2018 Same rationale for a PS only plan, right... QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Tom Poje Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Freddie the Unlucky is hired 1/3/2017. age 30 or 40, depends on the age of the lady he is talking to at the bar. he works 1000 hours in 2017. the regulations say 6 months after meeting 1 year of service or age 21.but his next entry date is 1/1/2019 Pam Shoup 1
BG5150 Posted March 9, 2018 Author Posted March 9, 2018 I'm guessing they could use the 2-yr eligibility with that entry date, tho' QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Belgarath Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 I don't think so. You could have 1-1/2 year eligibility, as long as you 100% vest immediately.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now