Earl Posted May 17, 2019 Posted May 17, 2019 Plan has increasing rates of match based upon years of service. Top rate has insufficient # of NHCEs so fails. Top rate is 50% up to 12% deferral. Second rate is 50% up to 10% deferral. No one in the second rate deferred more than 10% so moving them up to the top rate and applying the formula would have no effect on the contribution. So, can I: 1. Just give them 1% of pay anyway and be ok, or 2. Do I have to elevate lower years of service people with 12% or more deferral? ER would like #1 since they are longer service employees but would it be a valid correction of the match problem? Thank you CBW
justanotheradmin Posted May 17, 2019 Posted May 17, 2019 I don't understand option one. Who is getting 1%? Why 1%? I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say?
Earl Posted May 17, 2019 Author Posted May 17, 2019 Increase from 50% of 10% deferral (match rate tier 2) to 50% of 12% deferral (match rate tier 1) So it would be 50% of 2% of pay more, or 1% of pay. Does that clarify? The Employee in rate #2 only deferred 10% of pay. Can I give him 1% of pay and say he is in the top match tier even though the match formula for the top tier would not give him more $. Thanks for responding CBW
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now