Evelyn Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 Hi, my husband was notified that after several years, the “pension” portion of his Prevailing Wage Rate is required to be contributed to the company’s 401k program. We have our own savings plan independent of his company and do not want to use them. The employer says there are no exceptions. So now 26% of his wages have been deducted for this reason. Is this legal? They will not allow him to lower the percentage of contribution either.
Bill Presson Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 21 hours ago, Evelyn said: Hi, my husband was notified that after several years, the “pension” portion of his Prevailing Wage Rate is required to be contributed to the company’s 401k program. We have our own savings plan independent of his company and do not want to use them. The employer says there are no exceptions. So now 26% of his wages have been deducted for this reason. Is this legal? They will not allow him to lower the percentage of contribution either. Generally, no, there are no exceptions. It's an employer decision. (edited because it looked like I was answering the wrong thing. Thanks Larry) William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
Larry Starr Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 Bill meant to say YES, it is legal. It is indeed the employer's decision. We routinely set up PW/Davis Bacon plans and specifically lower the cash wages because it also saves a ton of money for the employer, especially in workers comp costs, which then makes the employer more competitive on bidding which then makes it likely there will be more work for his employees. The employee may not like that his W-2 part of the prevailing wage job has gone down, but his only remedy is to quit. This is 100% under the control of the employer and, as much as you may not like it, the employee has zero say in the matter. John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA, Evelyn and Bill Presson 2 1 Lawrence C. Starr, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, CPC, ChFC, EA, ATA, QPFC President Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc. 46 Daggett Drive West Springfield, MA 01089 413-736-2066 larrystarr@qpc-inc.com
Patricia Neal Jensen Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 Legal and in the employer's control. It is not the employee's money (in spite of what the author of this letter thinks). Patricia Neal Jensen, JD Vice President and Nonprofit Practice Leader |Future Plan, an Ascensus Company 21031 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor Woodland Hills, CA 91364 E patricia.jensen@futureplan.com P 949-325-6727
Bill Presson Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 18 hours ago, Larry Starr said: Bill meant to say YES, it is legal. It is indeed the employer's decision. We routinely set up PW/Davis Bacon plans and specifically lower the cash wages because it also saves a ton of money for the employer, especially in workers comp costs, which then makes the employer more competitive on bidding which then makes it likely there will be more work for his employees. The employee may not like that his W-2 part of the prevailing wage job has gone down, but his only remedy is to quit. This is 100% under the control of the employer and, as much as you may not like it, the employee has zero say in the matter. Thanks Larry. I edited to clarify that I was answering no exceptions. William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now