Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, my husband was notified that after several years, the “pension” portion of his Prevailing Wage Rate is required to be contributed to the company’s 401k program. We have our own savings plan independent of his company and do not want to use them. The employer says there are no exceptions. So now 26% of his wages have been deducted for this reason. Is this legal? They will not allow him to lower the percentage of contribution either.

Posted
21 hours ago, Evelyn said:

Hi, my husband was notified that after several years, the “pension” portion of his Prevailing Wage Rate is required to be contributed to the company’s 401k program. We have our own savings plan independent of his company and do not want to use them. The employer says there are no exceptions. So now 26% of his wages have been deducted for this reason. Is this legal? They will not allow him to lower the percentage of contribution either.

Generally, no, there are no exceptions. It's an employer decision. (edited because it looked like I was answering the wrong thing. Thanks Larry)

William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA
bill.presson@gmail.com
C 205.994.4070

 

Posted

Bill meant to say YES, it is legal.  It is indeed the employer's decision.  We routinely set up PW/Davis Bacon plans and specifically lower the cash wages because it also saves a ton of money for the employer, especially in workers comp costs, which then makes the employer more competitive on bidding which then makes it likely there will be more work for his employees.  The employee may not like that his W-2 part of the prevailing wage job has gone down, but his only remedy is to quit.  This is 100% under the control of the employer and, as much as you may not like it, the employee has zero say in the matter.

Lawrence C. Starr, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, CPC, ChFC, EA, ATA, QPFC
President
Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc.
46 Daggett Drive
West Springfield, MA 01089
413-736-2066
larrystarr@qpc-inc.com

Posted

Legal and in the employer's control.  It is not the employee's money (in spite of what the author of this letter thinks).

Patricia Neal Jensen, JD

Vice President and Nonprofit Practice Leader

|Future Plan, an Ascensus Company

21031 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor

Woodland Hills, CA 91364

E patricia.jensen@futureplan.com

P 949-325-6727

Posted
18 hours ago, Larry Starr said:

Bill meant to say YES, it is legal.  It is indeed the employer's decision.  We routinely set up PW/Davis Bacon plans and specifically lower the cash wages because it also saves a ton of money for the employer, especially in workers comp costs, which then makes the employer more competitive on bidding which then makes it likely there will be more work for his employees.  The employee may not like that his W-2 part of the prevailing wage job has gone down, but his only remedy is to quit.  This is 100% under the control of the employer and, as much as you may not like it, the employee has zero say in the matter.

Thanks Larry. I edited to clarify that I was answering no exceptions.

William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA
bill.presson@gmail.com
C 205.994.4070

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use