Get the Message Boards Digest by Email

Message Boards Digest

August 1, 2025

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

Peter Gulia created a topic in 401(k) Plans

2026 Catch-Up Deferrals as Roth: Is $150,000 the Limit on 2025 FICA Wages?

"Internal Revenue Code Section 414(v)(7)(A) sets $145,000 (inflation-adjusted) as the limit on a preceding year's FICA wages for a participant not to be constrained to make age-based-catch-up elective deferrals as Roth contributions.... Assuming all relevant years are calendar years: I estimate that, for 2025 FICA wages to drive how Section 414(v)(7) applies for 2026, the $145,000 will become $150,000. BenefitsLink neighbors, is this likely? Or would a Section 415(d)-method calculation come out differently?"

1 reply so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

Jakyasar created a topic in Retirement Plans in General

Qualified Replacement Plan Allocatons

"2 hypothetical scenarios so making things up: Scenario 1: A QRP receives 105k in excess assets from a DB plan and will allocate in 7 years. It is invested in a 0% interest bearing account. Year 1 must allocate 15k (1/7th of 105k) so end of Year 1 balance is now 90k What are the Year 2 and Year 3 requirements assuming minimum will be allocated? Scenario 2: Same as above with the exception it is invested in an account that will have 10% return Year 1 must allocate 15k but now end of Year 1 balance is 99k What are the Year 2 and Year 3 requirements assuming minimum will be allocated?"

3 replies so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

BG5150 created a topic in 401(k) Plans

Catch-Ups and Roth Availability

"With the new rules, must plans allow all participants the ability to make Roth deferrals? Or can a plan just have the Roth only for when it's required for catch-up?"

1 reply so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

HCE created a topic in Mergers and Acquisitions

280G Issues

"I'm having a lot of trouble with the 280G rules. I have a Disqualified Person who is 100% vested in separation pay. If the DP leaves for any reason, she gets a big payment. She also gets the same big payment (same $ amount) if she is terminated within 6 months of a change in control. We are going to have a change in control and she is going to be terminated. I don't know if the separation payment should be included in the parachute payment calculation.

  • On one hand, she is already vested in the total amount of the payment and would have received the payment upon termination regardless of the CIC.
  • On the other hand, she is being terminated in connection with the CIC, so the payment is contingent on an event related to the CIC.

The question is, does the payment go into the parachute payment calculation? Since she was already fully vested in the payment, is there some discount on how much is included in the parachute payment calculation. I know the regulations provide rules for 'vested' amounts that are accelerated due to the CIC, but I don't know if that applies here -- and even if it does apply, we have no idea how much the payment was accelerated, since we have no idea when termination would have occurred if not for the CIC (would she have worked 5 more years? 15?)."

1 reply so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

Here are the most recently posted jobs on EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com,® a service of BenefitsLink®

💼

Implementation Consultant  View details

Definiti
Remote

View job as Implementation Consultant for Definiti
►View More Jobs

►Post a Job

►Get Instant Job Alerts

► View All Earlier Topics   ► Subscribe to This Message Boards Digest

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Privacy Policy

Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this publication are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.