|
|
justanotheradmin created a topic in Correction of Plan Defects
"The calendar year end 403(b) plan in question is required to have the mandatory automatic enrollment provision as of 1/1/2025, as per SECURE. That is not in question. The question is how to correct a failure under EPCRS. The plan document did not include an automatic enrollment provision, and participants have not been automatically enrolled. There is no match contribution. A retroactive corrective amendment to add the provision,
effective as of 1/1/2025 seems appropriate. And then analysis for a missed opportunity to defer -- specifically a failure to implement an automatic contribution feature. Does it then follow that the plan can rely on the on the reduced QNEC provided in Rev Proc 2021-30 Appendix A part .05(8)? ... This seems like an aggressive interpretation of the correction options but I am open to being swayed that it others think it is perfectly
reasonable and not aggressive at all. What say all of you?"
|
|
[Sponsored]
PlanPort revolutionizes how advisors, recordkeepers, and TPAs use retirement plan documents across their business operations –- delivering efficiency, accuracy, review, and automation like never before. Now supporting 403(b), 457(b) and DB plans!
|
|
matlock77 created a topic in Retirement Plans in General
"Does anyone have a citation for the deadline to make an involuntary cash out of an account less than 7,000, other than that it has to happen after the participant was terminated? Not seeing any deadline requirements, wondering if a plan sponsor can theoretically let an account atrophy until it is eligible for cash out."
|
|
BG5150 created a topic in 401(k) Plans
"These days, for the most part, new plans must have an auto-enrollment feature. But can the ER stop the auto enroll after a few years? Or must it be in there forever? Does SECURE address that?"
|
|
TH 401k created a topic in 401(k) Plans
"The plan's eligibility conditions are age 21 and 1 year of service, with a monthly entry cycle. The rule of parity does not apply. Employee A was hired on 4/14/2022, terminated on 9/08/2022, and completed 590 hours. The employee was then rehired on 10/03/2023. If [employee had been] rehired 07/09/2023 what is the case of determining eligibility? In this situation, should eligibility be calculated from the original hire date or
from the rehire date? Could someone also explain, with examples, how eligibility is determined for rehired employees who rehired within one year versus after one."
|
Here are the most recently posted jobs on EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com,® a service of BenefitsLink®
|
|
💼
|
Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
Farmington MI / Hybrid
|
|
|
💼
|
Keating Inc
Remote / Manhattan KS / Overland Park KS / Wichita KS
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Privacy Policy
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this publication are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
|
 |