Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Regional Vice President of Sales

The Retirement Plan Company
(Remote / AL / FL / GA / MS)

The Retirement Plan Company logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company, Inc.
(Remote / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company, Inc. logo

Director of 3(16) Operations

Compass
(Remote / NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Business Development Director

AimPoint Pension
(Remote / Pompano Beach FL / AL / GA)

AimPoint Pension logo

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D.  Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Benefits Manager

Hall County Government
(Gainesville GA)

Hall County Government logo

Loan & Distribution Specialist

AimPoint Pension
(Remote)

AimPoint Pension logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

7th Cir.: Not Unconstitutional to Provide Domestic Partner Health Coverage for Same Sex Only
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, via FindLaw Link to more items from this source
[Opinion]
May 21, 2001

Excerpt: In July 1999, the Chicago Board of Education extended spousal health benefits to domestic partners--but only if the domestic partner was of the same sex as the employee, which excluded [female plaintiff Milagros] Irizarry's [male] domestic partner, an exclusion that she contends is unconstitutional. [Irizarry v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, No. 00-3216 (7th Cir. May 15, 2001)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.