Featured Jobs
Bates & Company
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Prime Pensions, Inc.
|
Benefit Associates, Inc.
|
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc.
|
Carpenter Morse Group
|
DPS Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC Retirement Plan Services
|
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc.
|
United 401(k) Plans, Inc.
|
Retirement, LLC
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| Letter to Company's Benefits Coordinators Was Sufficient Request for ERISA Documents (PDF) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit  [Opinion] Nov. 5, 2002 7 pages. Excerpt: [T]he District Court held that because [plaintiff] Romero addressed her requests for information to [benefits coordinators] Nelson and Ubil, not [the named plan administrator,] Serocca, she could not recover the civil penalty. We believe ... the 30-day period [begins to run when] the request is actually received either by the administrator or those under the administrator's supervision. [Romero v. SmithKline Beecham, No. 01-3273 (3d Cir. Oct. 30, 2002)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
