Featured Jobs
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Benefit Associates, Inc.
|
United 401(k) Plans, Inc.
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Carpenter Morse Group
|
Retirement, LLC
|
Prime Pensions, Inc.
|
DPS Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC Retirement Plan Services
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc.
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
Bates & Company
|
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc.
|
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra
|
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| Text of Latest Order in Cooper v. IBM Case (PDF) U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, via ERISA Industry Committee  [Opinion] Feb. 19, 2004 3 pages. Excerpt: IBM argues that under City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978), retroactive relief to the [plaintiff employee] class is not appropriate. |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
