Featured Jobs
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
3rd Circuit Court Says Stricter Standard Needed in Kosiba v. Merck & Co. ERISA Case
The Legal Intelligencer in Law.com
Sept. 14, 2004
Excerpt: In its June 2000 decision in Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that 'heightened scrutiny' is required when an insurance company both funds and administers an ERISA benefits plan since the combination of such fiduciary and non-fiduciary roles creates an inherent conflict of interest.
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |