Featured Jobs
MGKS
|
Retirement, LLC
|
Hicks Pension Services
|
Director of Pension Administration Primark Benefits
|
Loren D. Stark Company
|
Loren D. Stark Company
|
Primark Benefits
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager â DB or DC Focus Trinity Pension Consultants
|
United Benefit Pensions Inc.
|
401(k) Retirement Plan Administrator Midwest TPA with Remote Workforce |
CMC Pension Professionals
|
Junior Implementation Specialist - 401(k) Administration Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
|
Manager - Defined Contribution Plans M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
|
Jocelyn Pension Consulting
|
EPIC RPS
|
Hessel & Associates, LLC
|
Senior Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Site Manager / Senior Administrator Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
Aimpoint Pension
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| Supreme Court Approves of Disparate Impact Claims Involving Age Discrimination (PDF) Troutman Sanders  [Guidance Overview] Aug. 18, 2005 Pages 1-2 of 18. Excerpt: In light of the Court's ruling, employers should review their policies and procedures to confirm that they do not, in their application, adversely impact protected classes of employees, including those over 40. Further, employers should document the business reasons for employment decisions that impact a broad group of employees, and contact an attorney before implementing any policy that may adversely effect a large number of older workers. |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
