Full Seventh Circuit Refuses Request to Review Panel's Decision in Cash Balance Case

Featured Jobs

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
(San Francisco CA / AL / AZ / CO / DC / FL / IL / KY / LA / MA / NC / NJ / NV / NY / OR / SC / TN / TX / WA)

Retirement Plan Administrator

Group RHI
(Telecommute / Spring TX / Dallas TX / University Place WA)

Retirement Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Lebanon NJ)

Defined Contribution Plan Administrator

MGKS
(Phoenix AZ)

New Business Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Telecommute / CO / IA / IL / IN / KS / MN / MO / ND / NE / OH / OK / SD / WI / WY)

Retirement Plan Administrator

SPS
(Telecommute)

Client Success Team Leader

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA / AL / AZ / CO / DC / FL / IL / KY / LA / MA / NC / NJ / NV / NY / OR / SC / TN / TX / WA)

Director of Regulatory Affairs

Health Plans Inc
(Westborough MA)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

<< Previous news item | Next news item >>

Full Seventh Circuit Refuses Request to Review Panel's Decision in Cash Balance Case
Deloitte

Sept. 13, 2006

Excerpt: The full Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals will not re-hear a case alleging that cash balance plans are inherently age discriminatory. A three-judge panel from the Seventh Circuit early last month ruled cash balance plans do not run afoul of age discrimination prohibitions simply because younger workers have more time to earn interest credits on contributions than their older colleagues.

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).

An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).