Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company, Inc.
(Remote / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company, Inc. logo

Loan & Distribution Specialist

AimPoint Pension
(Remote)

AimPoint Pension logo

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D.  Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Regional Vice President of Sales

The Retirement Plan Company
(Remote / AL / FL / GA / MS)

The Retirement Plan Company logo

Business Development Director

AimPoint Pension
(Remote / Pompano Beach FL / AL / GA)

AimPoint Pension logo

Director of 3(16) Operations

Compass
(Remote / NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Seventh Circuit Rejects 'Reasonableness' as the Standard for Excessive Fee Claims Under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act (PDF)
Eversheds Sutherland, via Lexology Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
June 2, 2008

Excerpt: The Seventh Circuit, in Jones v. Harris Associates, rejected the 'reasonableness' standard, as articulated in Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management Inc., for evaluating excessive fee claims under Section 36(b), the Investment Company Act of 1940 ('1940 Act'). In so doing, it highlighted a split among the circuits as to the appropriate test for analyzing excessive fee claims.

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.