Featured Jobs
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Supreme Court Issues Two Significant Employee Benefits Decisions, But Uncertainty Remains (PDF)
Dechert LLP 
[Guidance Overview] July 16, 2008
4 pages. Excerpt: In its recent decisions in Kentucky Retirement Systems v. E.E.O.C. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Glenn, the United States Supreme Court addressed several important issues regarding the design of employee benefit plans and related litigation. Both decisions, however, have unfortunately left a number of significant issues undecided and may lead to confusion and uncertainty for litigants and courts alike.
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |