Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary Pension Plan Specialists, PC
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
A Constant State of Exhaustion? LaRue v. DeWolff Revisited
Benefits Law Journal via Jones Day [Guidance Overview] Sept. 17, 2008 Excerpt: The real surprise in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., 552 U.S. _____, 128 S. Ct. 1020 (2008) ('LaRue'), was its purposeful suggestion that plan participants may be required to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing breach of fiduciary duty lawsuits. Both the five-member majority opinion, as well as the Chief Justice's concurring opinion (joined by Justice Kennedy), made this same point. |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |