Featured Jobs
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
A Constant State of Exhaustion? LaRue v. DeWolff Revisited
Jones Day 
[Guidance Overview] Sept. 17, 2008 Excerpt: The real surprise in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., 552 U.S. _____, 128 S. Ct. 1020 (2008) ('LaRue'), was its purposeful suggestion that plan participants may be required to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing breach of fiduciary duty lawsuits. Both the five-member majority opinion, as well as the Chief Justice's concurring opinion (joined by Justice Kennedy), made this same point. MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |