Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

3(16) Retirement Plan & Customer Liaison

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

DC Administrator

Pension Investors Corporation
(Remote / Altamonte Springs FL)

Pension Investors Corporation logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Testimony of American Benefits Council on Proposed Regs for Minimum Present Value Requirements for Partial Annuity Distributions (PDF)
American Benefits Council Link to more items from this source
[Opinion]
June 2, 2012

5 pages. "[The preamble to the proposed regulations states that,] when one portion of a retirement benefit distribution subject to the section 417(e) factors is a 'decreasing' benefit, both portions of the distribution are subject to the minimum present value requirements of section 417(e)(3). The Council believes that the current regulation does not clearly require that, and can be reasonably interpreted to reach the opposite result. Due to this uncertainty, the Council believes that the clarification of the rules, as provided by the proposed regulations, should apply prospectively, and that Treasury and the Service should clearly state that no inference should be drawn regarding the law prior to the effective date of the final regulation."  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).