Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Planning to Annuitize Current Retirees? Fifth Circuit Unambiguously Upholds Verizon's Right to De-Risk
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Link to more items from this source
Aug. 19, 2015

"The court made the following rulings ... [1] The decision to annuitize was not a fiduciary act.... [2] The possibility of annuitization was not required to be disclosed in the [SPD].... [3] Participant consent was not required for annuitization of their benefits.... [4] Section 510 of ERISA ... was not violated merely because the plaintiffs did not have rights to continued plan participation, ERISA coverage or PBGC insurance.... [5] Paying $1 billion in fees and expenses as part of the $8.4 billion annuitization was not a fiduciary breach.... [6] It was not imprudent to purchase one group annuity contract from Prudential rather than from multiple insurers." [Lee v. Verizon Comm. Inc., No. 14-10553 (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2015)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).