TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Pollard & Associates
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
What Does the EEOC's Lawsuit Against Estee Lauder Mean for Parental Leave Policies?
Mintz Levin Sept. 27, 2017 "Last month, the EEOC filed a lawsuit against Estee Lauder in a Pennsylvania federal court alleging that Estee Lauder's parental leave policy discriminates against employees on the basis of gender by providing unequal benefits to biological mothers and fathers. What's notable about this lawsuit is that it involves a policy which, on its face, uses a 'primary' and 'secondary' caregiver distinction that provides different amounts of leave to employees based on that distinction without regard to their gender -- a practice used by many employers in their parental leave policies." |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |