Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement USA LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA LLC logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

DB Account Manager

Pentegra
(Remote)

Pentegra logo

Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Remote / NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Southern Pension Services
(Remote / Tampa FL / CO / Hybrid)

Southern Pension Services logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Staff Accountant

BPAS
(Huntingdon Valley PA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Utica NY / PA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

3(16) Fiduciary Analyst

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions logo

Managing Director - Operations, Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote / CT / MA / NJ / NY / PA / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Hybrid)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Search the News Archive

6 Matching News Items

1.  DeBofsky & Associates, PC Link to more items from this source
Sept. 18, 2015
"Following the promulgation of a model law by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners that bans the inclusion of so-called discretionary clauses in health and disability insurance policies, several states have issued laws or regulations adopting the NAIC's model law.... The reason discretionary clauses have been singled out for attention is because of a 1989 Supreme Court ruling, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch ... The Supreme Court held in Firestone that the typical judicial review standard applied in adjudicating ERISA cases is the de novo standard, which requires the court to independently adjudicate whether the benefit claimant is entitled to the benefits sought."
2.  DeBofsky & Associates, PC Link to more items from this source
Nov. 20, 2015
"[E]ven if [Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Bruch] discretion-granting language is present, that does not necessarily end the discussion, as illustrated by a recent ruling from a federal court in California.... [T]he court was presented with insurance policy documentation that clearly reserved discretionary authority to the insurer, Principal. Yet the court found the grant of discretion was negated and applied the de novo standard of judicial review[.] The court's rationale involved a choice of law determination." [Hirschkron v. Principal Life Ins. Co., No. 15-cv-00664 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2015)]
3.  DeBofsky & Associates, PC Link to more items from this source
Nov. 15, 2015
"The court was disturbed by Aetna's insistence on 'objective medical evidence' in the absence of a policy requirement mandating such evidence. Moreover, the court found that the nature of [the employee's] impairment made it impossible for him to produce the type of evidence that Aetna demanded. The court was also dubious about the validity of Aetna's vocational assessment and also questioned its medical consultants' findings.... [The court] pointed out that Aetna did not have a license to ignore reliable evidence, yet it appeared to the court that Aetna did just that." [Charles v. UPS Long Term Disability Plan, No. 12-06223 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2015)]
4.  DeBofsky & Associates, PC Link to more items from this source
Oct. 22, 2015
"[If] a worker is promised a tax-free disability insurance benefit, and that employee later becomes simultaneously eligible to receive both long-term disability payments and Social Security disability insurance payments, which reduce the LTD payments, does the insurer get to offset the gross amount of SSDI or the after-tax net amount? ... The court ruled that no language in the plan supported the plaintiff's claim that the offset of Social Security benefits would be based on the net benefits after taxes and that illustrations in a summary plan description ... compelled a conclusion that the gross benefit is offset.... The court's ruling appears unjustified." [Troiano v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 14-496-ML (D.R.I. Sept. 30, 2015)]
5.  DeBofsky & Associates, PC Link to more items from this source
Aug. 30, 2015
"The court noted that for the ERISA exemption to apply, the corporation would need to have been owned by one person and his or her spouse. In this particular situation, however, the plaintiff owned the company along with two others, so the ERISA exemption did not apply." [Silverman v. Unum Group, No. 14-CV-6439 (S.D.N.Y. July 30, 2015)]
6.  DeBofsky & Associates, PC Link to more items from this source
Feb. 22, 2015
"[T]he court determined that Dr. Gonda was highly educated and had sufficient time to review and consider the settlement agreement, which he reviewed with an attorney who was representing him in the employment case. Dr. Gonda also received consideration for the release, which explicitly referenced ERISA claims against his employer and related parties. The court expressed concern that disability benefits were not discussed during the settlement negotiations and LINA also waited for three years while internal appeals were pending before raising the issue." [Gonda v. The Permanente Medical Group, No. 11-cv-01363-sc (N.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2015)]

Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches

  • Quotation marks can be used to require an exact phrase, such as
    "standard of review"
  • When CAPITALIZED, the words AND, OR and NOT are logic operators, which are especially powerful when multiple words (e.g., synonyms) are grouped in parentheses, such as
    (vested OR vesting OR lifetime) AND (retiree OR retirement) AND (health OR healthcare) AND (benefits OR coverage)

[Back to the Search Form]