Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Utica NY / PA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

DB Account Manager

Pentegra
(Remote)

Pentegra logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Southern Pension Services
(Remote / Tampa FL / CO / Hybrid)

Southern Pension Services logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement USA LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA LLC logo

Staff Accountant

BPAS
(Huntingdon Valley PA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

3(16) Fiduciary Analyst

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions logo

Managing Director - Operations, Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote / CT / MA / NJ / NY / PA / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Hybrid)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Remote / NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Search the News Archive

354 Matching News Items

1.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
June 26, 2012
"[T]he proposed regulations address the constraint imposed by Code section 436(d)(2) which -- as added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 -- requires single-employer defined benefit plans to provide that no prohibited payment will be made while the plan sponsor is in bankruptcy.... To resolve the competing interests, the regulations propose a limited exception to the anti-cutback rule by which a plan sponsor in bankruptcy would be permitted to amend the plan to eliminate a single-sum distribution (or other optional form providing for accelerated payment) if certain conditions are satisfied."
2.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
June 26, 2012
"A recent report on the PCIP program reveals the deep need for such coverage, and the striking difference in health care utilization between PCIP participants and those in established plans.... Illustrative of the need for care by the PCIP enrollees is a comparison between enrollees in the federally administered PCIP and those in an established health plan in the Federal Employees Health Benefits plan."
3.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
June 26, 2012
"Issue: Whether dividends and dividend equivalents relating to restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs) that are performance-based compensation under Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code must separately satisfy the requirements under Section 162(m)(4)(C) to be treated as performance-based compensation."
4.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
June 24, 2012
"[T]he rule modifies the phase-in of the annual dollar limits on essential health benefits, requires notice to be given to students explaining how the coverage differs from other individual market coverage, and applies the medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements to the issuers (although certain adjustments are provided). With the goal of having the new requirements apply to the 2012-13 academic year, the final rule is generally effective for policy years beginning on or after July 1, 2012. The MLR requirements apply beginning January 1, 2013."
5.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
June 24, 2012
"Seeking to provide training for agents who will be auditing plans for compliance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), the IRS initiated a project to identify potential areas of non-compliance. Although the project remains ongoing, the IRS released a list of issues it has identified so far ... [T]he release notes that many of the identified PPA compliance issues are failures to comply with the funding rules and would, therefore, involve the potential assessment of excise taxes and penalties rather than raise qualification concerns."
6.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
June 24, 2012
"The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an amendment changing the formula for calculating the social security offset in a defined benefit plan did not violate the anti-cutback rule under ERISA section 204(g) -- which prohibits plan amendments that reduce a participant's accrued benefit. The affected participants were not yet eligible for a retirement benefit under the plan, so the more favorable preamendment social security offset formula was not part of their accrued benefit, the court found."
7.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
June 13, 2012
"The IRS issued proposed regulations to clarify the application of Code section 83, which provides that property transferred in connection with the performance of services is included in the service provider's income once it is transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The proposed regulations clarify that: (i) a substantial risk of forfeiture may be established only through a service condition or a condition related to the purpose of the transfer, (ii) both the likelihood that the forfeiture event will occur and the likelihood the forfeiture will be enforced need to be considered in determining whether there is a substantial risk of forfeiture, and (iii) transfer restrictions do not create a substantial risk of forfeiture except as specifically provided under Code section 83(c)(3) or related regulations."
8.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
Feb. 7, 2012
The FINRA relief is similar to that issued earlier by the SEC. In an October 2011 No-Action letter, the SEC agreed to treat information provided by a plan administrator to participants that is 'required by and complies with' the ERISA ? 404(a) disclosure requirements as satisfying the requirements of Rule 482 under the 1933 Act. The ERISA ? 404(a) regulations include an optional Model Comparative Chart for making the required financial disclosures to plan participants.
9.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
Jan. 31, 2012
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) included a safe-harbor for ERISA plans under the 'business conduct standards' for swap dealers under the Dodd-Frank Act .... In a letter to the CFTC, [DOL] affirmed that the final rule will not require swap dealers to engage in conduct that will cause them to become ERISA fiduciaries.
10.  Deloitte via BenefitsLink Link to more items from this source
Jan. 24, 2012
Last month the CMS announced that the ERRP would be closed for claims incurred after December 31, 2011, due to the projected exhaustion of funds.
   Next »

Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches

  • Quotation marks can be used to require an exact phrase, such as
    "standard of review"
  • When CAPITALIZED, the words AND, OR and NOT are logic operators, which are especially powerful when multiple words (e.g., synonyms) are grouped in parentheses, such as
    (vested OR vesting OR lifetime) AND (retiree OR retirement) AND (health OR healthcare) AND (benefits OR coverage)

[Back to the Search Form]