Featured Jobs
|
Pentegra
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
BPAS
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Southern Pension Services
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
6 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
Epstein Becker Green and The ERISA Industry Committee [ERIC]
Apr. 19, 2012
The inaugural issue of this quarterly publication contains six case summaries and a featured article: "Benefit Claim Denial Litigation After Glenn and Conkright."
|
| 2. |
Epstein Becker Green; The ERISA Industry Committee [ERIC]
Nov. 21, 2016
Articles include: [1] The Goldilocks Paradox for defined contribution plans: how will plan sponsors determine whether investment alternatives offered are 'just right'? [2] ERISA class action certified challenging behavioral health TPA's administration of mental health benefits; [3] Defining the scope of ERISA preemption; [4] Plan fiduciaries continue to be scrutinized; [5] Employers offering their own proprietary funds under their 401(k) plans at heightened risk for litigation; and [6] EEOC loses another wellness plan voluntariness challenge but prevails on its ADA safe harbor argument.
|
| 3. |
Epstein Becker Green and The ERISA Industry Committee [ERIC]
Mar. 23, 2016
9 pages. Articles include: [1] The oddity of an evenly divided Supreme Court; [2] Bell v. Anthem: Fee litigation and fiduciary responsibility; [3] EEOC v. Flambeau: ADA benefit plan safe harbor trumps EEOC wellness program voluntariness attack; [4] ADA investigations: Do your benefit websites make you a disability discrimination litigation target? [5] Supreme Court narrows plans' subrogation remedies; [6] Gallo v. Moen Inc.: Progress in repudiating Yard-Man; [7] Marin v. Dave & Buster's: ERISA class action exposure from reducing employees' hours; and [8] Group health plan's residential treatment exclusion violates Mental Health Parity Act.
|
| 4. |
Epstein Becker Green and The ERISA Industry Committee [ERIC]
July 17, 2014
18 pages. Article titles include: [1] Recent Supreme Court Decisions Revise Rules for Stock Drop Cases; [2] Hobby Lobby and the Questions Left Unanswered; [3] Post-Amara Landscape Continues to Evolve; [4] Supreme Court to Decide Whether a Failed Class Action May Extend Deadline to Bring Follow-on Claims by Individual Plaintiffs; [5] Supreme Court Indicates That It Will Review 'Tibble'; [6] Challenges Could Threaten Individual Subsidies and Employer Mandate Penalties in States with Federal Exchanges; [7] Supreme Court Accepts Cert. in Retiree Health Vesting Case; [8] Third Circuit Urged to Correct Misapplication of Fiduciary Deference Standard; and [9] Will the Plaintiffs' Bar Ask the Courts to Declare Deferential Judicial Review of ERISA Benefits Denials Unconstitutional?
|
| 5. |
Epstein Becker Green and The ERISA Industry Committee [ERIC]
Sept. 30, 2012
"In so deciding, the Court rejected longstanding [IRS] rulings on the treatment of supplemental unemployment benefits ('SUB payments') under FICA, as well as a contrary decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in CSX Corp. v. United States, 518 F. 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2008)." [United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., No. 10-1563 (6th Cir. Sept. 7, 2012)]
|
| 6. |
Epstein Becker Green and The ERISA Industry Committee [ERIC]
Sept. 9, 2012
Quarterly Newsletter; articles in this issue include: Practical Guidance for Employer Plan Sponsors from the Tussey v. ABB, Inc., Decision; Why It May Be Important to Your Administration of Pension Plans for the Supreme Court to Decide If Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act Is Enforceable; and Important Issues in Pending Cases -- Subrogation: U.S. Airways, Inc. v. James E. McCutchen (3d Cir. November 16, 2011) -- Forum Selection Clauses: Mozingo v. Trend Personnel Serv., Dkt. No. 11-3282 (10th Cir.) -- Judicial Deference: Frommert v. Conkright, Dkt. No. 12-67 (2d Cir.).
|
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|