Featured Jobs
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Pentegra
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Compass
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
40 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
Faegre & Benson
July 2, 2012
"On June 26, 2012, OCR released the protocol that will be used to perform the audits required by HITECH. The protocol addresses seven aspects of the Privacy Rule and three aspects of the Security Rule.... The protocol also covers the requirements of the Breach Notification Rule. In all, the protocol establishes 77 performance criteria and related audit procedures under the Security Rule and 88 performance criteria and related audit procedures under the Privacy and Breach Notification Rules."
|
| 2. |
Faegre & Benson
June 21, 2012
"Employers with self-funded group health plans may wish to follow suit and promise to continue providing coverage for their employee's adult children up to age 26. However, employers should note that this decision may have tax implications for the covered adult children. If PPACA is struck down, both the provisions requiring coverage of adult children up to age 26 and the provisions allowing that coverage to be free from federal taxes will disappear."
|
| 3. |
Faegre & Benson
May 30, 2012
"Here are some of the topics which are addressed: FAQ 1: Expanding on the circumstances in which an SBC may be provided electronically (discussed in a previous FAQ), the DOL has added a new safe harbor for providing SBCs electronically to participants and beneficiaries in connection with their online enrollment or online renewal of coverage under the plan. FAQ 7: The DOL clarifies that it is permissible to 'combine' SBCs or SBC elements to provide a side-by-side comparison to facilitate comparisons of different benefit package options by individuals shopping for coverage."
|
| 4. |
Faegre & Benson
Dec. 29, 2011
Four other states allow or will allow civil unions: Delaware, Hawaii, New Jersey and Rhode Island, but only Hawaii will recognize civil unions for opposite-sex couples (the Hawaii civil union law is effective January 1, 2012). The implication of the IRS letter for Hawaii and other states with opposite-sex domestic partnerships (such as Nevada, California and Washington) is unknown.
|
| 5. |
Faegre & Benson
Nov. 7, 2011
Wisconsin is the last state in the country to conform its state tax treatment of such coverage with federal tax treatment, which means that once this law takes effect, employers will no longer need to worry about imputing income for the value of such coverage to employees in any state.
|
| 6. |
Faegre & Benson
Oct. 30, 2011
Although health care reform legislation excluded the value of employer-provided health benefits provided to any employee's child under the age of 27 at the end of the taxable year (not just tax dependents) effective March 30, 2010, several states did not incorporate that change into state law. As a result, there has been some confusion as to whether the value of employer-provided health benefits provided to non-tax dependent children would be subject to state taxes in those states.
|
| 7. |
Faegre & Benson
Sept. 18, 2011
Michigan has become the newest state to institute an assessment on paid health care claims. Michigan Senate Bill No. 348, effective August 24, 2011, creates the 'Health Insurance Claims Assessment Act' and initiates a 1% assessment on paid health claims.
|
| 8. |
Extension of Minnesota State Tax Conformity with Federal Tax Treatment of Coverage of Adult Children
Faegre & Benson
July 21, 2011
[F]or all plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010, the value of employer-provided health benefits provided to any employee's child under the age of 27 at the end of the taxable year (not just tax dependents) may be excluded from income for Minnesota state tax, as well as federal tax, purposes.
|
| 9. |
Faegre & Benson
July 11, 2011
Recent changes to Illinois and New York state laws impact health benefits, specifically the taxation of covering domestic partners, civil union partners and same-sex spouses.
|
| 10. |
Faegre & Benson
May 5, 2011
The employer will NOT be required to report health care coverage value to retirees or other former employees to whom the employer does not normally issue a Form W-2.
|
| Next » |
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|