Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Pentegra
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Southern Pension Services
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
211 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
Haynes Boone
Nov. 6, 2025
"In general, pure severance pay ('Severance Pay') is not considered Plan Compensation, but post-severance payments related to compensation earned and accrued during employment ('Post-Severance Pay') are Plan Compensation.... Some plan documents exclude all post-termination payments, including Post-Severance Pay from compensation, so it's always important to review the plan's definition of Plan Compensation [.]"
|
| 2. |
Haynes Boone
Oct. 14, 2025
"An important takeaway for an employer-sponsor of a top hat plan is that the plan's language pertaining to plan amendments, or termination of the plan itself, needs to be carefully drafted to preserve the employer's discretion, otherwise the employer could be contractually limited in its rights to take future actions." [Hoak v. Ledford, No. 24-12148 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2025)]
|
| 3. |
Haynes Boone
Oct. 8, 2025
"It's that time of year when employers are finalizing their open enrollment materials. Along with benefit changes and annual disclosures, employers should also review their Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) and understand when it needs to be distributed."
|
| 4. |
Haynes Boone
Sept. 2, 2025
"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ... made the following points: [1] When assignment forms are broadly drafted, they may be ambiguous as to who the assignee is, but that does not invalidate the assignments. [2] There is not a requirement that an assignment form include a standalone 'right to sue' provision when the form assigns 'all rights' or 'all insurance benefits.' [3] An ERISA plan administrator may be prevented from enforcing plan provisions ... against a claimant if the administrator refuses to provide the document containing those provisions to the claimant." [Angelina Emergency Med. Assoc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ala., No. 24-10306 (5th Cir. Aug. 8, 2025)]
|
| 5. |
Haynes Boone
Aug. 11, 2025
"A recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals case reminds us that these plans must satisfy unique compliance requirements to continue to remain exempt from such ERISA provisions. This case determined that plan participants did not have a state law fiduciary duty claim because ERISA preempts state laws, provided that the top hat plan complies with certain requirements[.]" [Aldridge v. Regions Bank, No. 24-5603 (6th Cir. Jul. 17, 2025)]
|
| 6. |
Haynes Boone
July 8, 2025
"In considering whether to distribute the SMM versus an updated SPD, plan administrators should consider the number of modifications that need to be described and whether the use of the SMM alone would sufficiently apprise covered persons of their benefits, rights, and obligations under the plan."
|
| 7. |
Haynes Boone
June 23, 2025
"The PR Supreme Court determined that, even if a statute's language may be ambiguous, the final interpretation of such statute is ultimately under the courts' purview and not administrative agencies. Similar to U.S. law, Puerto Rico courts are no longer required to provide deference to administrative agencies." [Vázquez v. Consejo de Titulares y Junta de Directores del Condominio Los Corales, 2025 TSPR 56 (May 21, 2025)]
|
| 8. |
Haynes Boone
May 29, 2025
"The court found that the former employee was asking about his benefits as a whole and the company had a fiduciary duty to respond to his inquiry with complete and accurate information regarding all benefits, including the information that his life insurance policy would need to be converted or else it would lapse, given that he was still within the eligibility window for conversion." [Watson v. EMC Corp., No. 19-2667 (D. Colo. May 7, 2025)]
|
| 9. |
Haynes Boone
May 13, 2025
"In stock acquisitions and mergers, it is not uncommon for both the target company and the buyer to sponsor 401(k) plans, which requires the buyer to decide prior to closing whether to terminate the target's plan, continue it, or merge it into the buyer's plan.... [T]he options of what to do with a target's 401(k) plan are much more limited after the transaction closes[.]"
|
| 10. |
Haynes Boone
May 7, 2025
"The SEC's Division of Corporation Finance recently added a new Exchange Act Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (CDI) clarifying that when a participant in a Section 401(k) plan who is subject to the insider trading rules sells company stock through a self-directed brokerage window, the sale must satisfy all conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c)(1), including those applicable to purchases and sales of the issuer's securities on the open market."
|
| Next » |
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|