Featured Jobs
|
DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
|
|
The Pension Source
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Retirement Combo Plan Administrator Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
|
|
Defined Benefit Specialist II or III Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Merkley Retirement Consultants
|
|
Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
|
July Business Services
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
65 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
Mar. 27, 2025
"A group of insurers challenged the [U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's] coverage mandates as invalid because its members were not constitutionally appointed as 'officers of the United States' under Article II's Appointments Clause.... The case is now before the Supreme Court, where MI has filed a brief supporting the challengers that explains the original meaning of superior and inferior officers for purposes of the Appointments Clause and overall political accountability." [Braidwood Mgmt, Inc. v. Becerra, No. 23-10326 (5th Cir. Jun. 21, 2024; cert. pet. granted Jan. 10, 2025)]
|
| 2. |
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
June 13, 2017
"Broadly speaking, robust generic competition, along with the advent of large and sophisticated payers, has kept the relative share of health care costs attributable to medicines broadly stable, even as new medicines have become a cornerstone of treatment for acute and chronic illness. However, there are real challenges facing the health care system today, specifically for patients with serious chronic illnesses who are facing high coinsurance or deductibles largely for what are called 'specialty' medicines, and that challenge needs to be addressed."
|
| 3. |
Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions [HELP], U.S. Senate
Dec. 10, 2025
Dec. 10, 2025. Video with testimony from: [1] James R. Copland, Manhattan Institute; [2] Chad Williams, Edward Jones; [3] Richard Fiesta, Alliance for Retired Americans.
|
| 4. |
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
Sept. 18, 2025
"Since the 1990s, our retirement system has been based on three pillars: government benefits, pensions from employers, and additional private saving. This report redefines each pillar for the modern labor force and financial markets -- and it proposes adding a fourth.... As part of the second pillar, 401(k)s could provide retirees with stable income. Yet this option remains rare because of regulatory hurdles.... Reimagining the retirement system requires adding a fourth pillar: working into retirement.... [R]ight now, obstacles -- on both the supply and demand side -- prevent many older Americans from working at all, even if they would like to do so."
|
| 5. |
Chris Pope, Manhattan Institute in City Journal
July 31, 2025
"America's high drug prices are largely self-inflicted. Foreign health systems often refuse to pay for expensive new treatments unless the price comes down. The Trump administration can't reduce America's high drug costs without addressing their domestic underlying causes: laws and regulations that force insurers and government programs to cover a wide array of drugs and new therapies without regard to value for money."
|
| 6. |
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
May 22, 2025
"In theory, [ICHRAs] should be an attractive option, since the cheapest individual market plans now cost, on average, 31% less than comparable employer-purchased health-insurance plans. But very few firms currently offer ICHRA funds because federal regulations prohibit giving individual workers a choice between group health insurance and ICHRA.... [E]mployers should be allowed to offer workers a choice between both options, so long as their ICHRA contributions exceed minimum standards and their group plans conform to the same benefit requirements as those for the individual market."
|
| 7. |
Manhattan Institute
June 8, 2021
"[T]he precarious financing of state individual-market risk pools, as structured by ACA, is inherently incompatible with vigorous interstate competition. However, the large economies of scale associated with many health-care services make competition across state lines essential to the efficient provision of medical care. Such competition will require reestablishing an individual insurance market outside ACA's regulatory framework."
|
| 8. |
Charles Blahous, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
Feb. 23, 2020
"[Is] there a genuine case to be made for the ideal of the government providing goods and services alongside private alternatives? ... [Two] law professors ... argue that there is -- citing the postal service, public defense attorneys, and municipal golf courses as examples ... [T]heir argument for establishing or expanding various 'public options' in a number of policy areas is most convincing as a critique of voucher-based government spending."
|
| 9. |
Manhattan Institute
Jan. 14, 2020
"PRB is a state agency that oversees Texas's 90-plus defined-benefit public pension plans.... This paper and the accompanying model legislation make the case for a state-level pension review board. Policymakers who wish to implement a PRB-style agency in their state can use them as a road map."
|
| 10. |
Chris Pope, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
Dec. 15, 2019
"[A] reasonable argument could be made for a strictly limited arbitration provision, to help fine-tune benchmark rates to adjust for localized market idiosyncrasies. But the outline of the revised bill goes far beyond this ... Rather than helping to ensure access to emergency care by refining benchmarks to account for local circumstances, this array of permitted justifications is so broad as to eliminate constraints and considerations of value-for-money from the determination of payment for emergency care altogether."
|
| Next » |
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|