Featured Jobs
|
Compass
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
DC Retirement Plan Administrator Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Pentegra
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
55 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
WealthManagement.com
Aug. 13, 2025
"In the FINRA award dated Aug. 8, a three-person panel ruled against former Morgan Stanley rep Patrick T. O'Neill.... In the arbitration, [O'Neill] argued that Morgan Stanley's deferred compensation plan forfeiture for advisors who leave is 'impermissible under ERISA.' " [O'Neill v. Morgan Stanley, No. 24-00358 (FINRA Aug. 8, 2025)]
|
| 2. |
Financial Advisor
July 14, 2025
"Morgan Stanley has lost a court battle in its long-running fight to withhold deferred compensation from financial advisors who left the firm -- opening the door for more than 100 advisors to move forward in their FINRA arbitration claims ... [T]he Second Circuit ... dismissed Morgan Stanley's appeal of a 2023 New York U.S. District Court decision that found the advisors' deferred compensation was protected under [ERISA].... The claims range in size from the mid-five-figures to multimillion-dollar cases[.]" [Shafer v. Morgan Stanley, No. 24-3141 (2d Cir. July 9, 2025; unpub.)]
|
| 3. |
Roberts Disability Law
July 10, 2025
"Morgan Stanley argued that the district court's commentary on the merits of the underlying ERISA claims rendered its order effectively a 'denial' of arbitration, and therefore appealable. The Second Circuit rejected this novel theory, citing the statute's plain language and declining to interpret a granted motion as a constructive denial.... Morgan Stanley separately sought a writ of mandamus ... to erase the district court's conclusion that the compensation plans were governed by ERISA. But the Second Circuit made clear that such relief is only available in extreme circumstances." [Shafer v. Morgan Stanley, No. 24-3141 (2d Cir. July 9, 2025; unpub.)]
|
| 4. |
District Court Finds Morgan Stanley's Deferred Compensation Program for Advisors Is Subject to ERISA
MSN News
Jan. 8, 2024
"[A] federal judge granted Morgan Stanley's request to force a group of former Morgan Stanley advisors suing the company over deferred compensation to take their claims to private arbitration. However, in that same order, the judge found that Morgan Stanley's deferred compensation programs are governed by ERISA ... Morgan Stanley [has asked] the judge to reconsider his ruling." [Shafer v. Morgan Stanley, No. 20-11047 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2023)]
|
| 5. |
Trucker Huss
Nov. 2, 2025
"The complaint states that the Opinion used a purpose test and determined that the plan's purposes were to provide bonuses and not retirement income, when case law requires an examination of whether the plan has the effect of deferring income to termination of employment or beyond.... [It] is not unforeseeable that the court that previously held that the Morgan Stanley plan is subject to ERISA will invalidate the Opinion holding it is not." [Sheresky v. Chaves-DeRemer, No. 25-8935 (S.D.N.Y. complaint filed Oct. 28, 2025)]
|
| 6. |
PLANADVISER
Oct. 29, 2025
"Three former Morgan Stanley financial advisers ... [allege] the agency acted unlawfully when it issued an advisory opinion siding with Morgan Stanley about whether certain deferred compensation plans are protected under [ERISA]. The lawsuit ... claims the DOL's [Advisory Opinion 2025-03A] violated the Administrative Procedure Act and unfairly interfered with ongoing arbitration proceedings." [Sheresky v. Chaves-DeRemer, No. 25-8935 (S.D.N.Y. complaint filed Oct. 28, 2025)]
|
| 7. |
Trucker Huss
Sept. 16, 2025
"There are several arbitrations and even lawsuits over the Plan which Morgan has been defending for years. In those cases, the plaintiff-advisors maintain that the Plan is subject to ERISA and violates its minimum vesting rules. Morgan has been winning many arbitrations. However, in July the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held the Plan was subject to ERISA and the plaintiff's in the class action could go to arbitration with their claims.... The DOL's Advisory Opinion gives Morgan even more ammunition to defend the arbitrations and may even chill future claims." [Shafer v. Morgan Stanley, No. 24-3141 (2d Cir. Jul. 9, 2025).]
|
| 8. |
WealthAdvisor
Sept. 15, 2025
"For wealth advisors and RIAs, the implications of this ongoing dispute extend beyond the legal maneuvers. Deferred compensation remains a powerful retention tool across the wirehouse and brokerage landscape ... If courts or regulators were to determine that such programs fall under ERISA, it could significantly alter how firms structure advisor pay, adding compliance burdens and limiting forfeiture provisions that firms rely on to retain talent." [DOL Advisory Opinion 2025-03A; O'Neill v. Morgan Stanley, No. 24-00358 (FINRA Aug. 8, 2025)]
|
| 9. |
Financial Advisor
Sept. 10, 2025
"The DOL's opinion, which was requested by Morgan Stanley outside counsel, comes on the heels of a string of arbitration victories for the firm in disputes over deferred compensation. Over the past two years, it has successfully defended at least five consecutive challenges, saving millions of dollars and further solidifying its stance that its plans are lawful and enforceable."
|
| 10. |
WealthManagement.com
Nov. 7, 2024
"A federal judge reaffirmed his earlier decision that Morgan Stanley's deferred compensation plans fall under federal mandates ... The decision ... is the latest development in a years-long class action suit filed by an array of former Morgan Stanley advisors. The group accused the wirehouse of denying millions in deferred compensation when reps left for other firms." [Shafer v. Morgan Stanley, No. 20-11047 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2024)]
|
| Next » |
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|