Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Compliance Consultant

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Frank Pension Consultants, Ltd.
(Lincolnshire IL)

Frank Pension Consultants, Ltd. logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions 2

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Northwestern Wisconsin Associates, Inc. (NWA, Inc.)
(Wausau WI / Hybrid)

Northwestern Wisconsin Associates, Inc. (NWA, Inc.) logo

Relationship Manager - Defined Contributions

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Search the News Archive

11338 Matching News Items

1.  Stephen Rosenberg, The Wagner Law Group Link to more items from this source
Nov. 18, 2014

"As an evidentiary bar, [the Ninth Circuit's requirement of extraordinary circumstances] separates the routine case where there is a random misstatement from a low level HR person upon which a plaintiff's lawyer tries to fashion an entire estoppel claim (which federal court judges have been seeing, and for the most part rejecting, for years) from a deliberate pattern and practice of self-serving conduct that harms participants (and which federal court judges don't see all that often). These types of additional requirements for estoppel claims under the equitable relief provision of ERISA, above and beyond the standard requirement of reasonable reliance on a misstatement of fact, allow the courts to limit this type of relief, in the ERISA context, to the more egregious circumstances only." [Tetreault v. Reliance Standard, No. 13-2353 (1st Cir. Oct. 6, 2014); Gabriel v. Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, No. 12-354581 (9th Cir. June 6, 2014)]  MORE >>

2.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith and Company Link to more items from this source
Apr. 27, 2017

"When asked who is financially responsible for retirement, most priests respond that it is a shared responsibility. However, there is no consensus on what this means (e.g., equal sharing, diocese has the majority, priest has the majority, etc.). Perhaps the most uniform response is related to the question, 'Does the Diocese do a good job providing you with retirement planning information?' Surveys show that 60%-80% respond with a 'NO' to this question."  MORE >>

3.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith and Company Link to more items from this source
Sept. 28, 2016

8 pages. "In some plans, it may be obvious that no one is affected by the Section 415(b) limit. In most other plans, simplified procedures may be applied to test the vast majority of retiring participant's benefits against the Section 415(b) limit and to isolate those few individuals whose benefits are close enough to the applicable limit to warrant detailed testing. In most cases, detailed testing will require the services of one or more outside experts[.]"  MORE >>

4.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
July 1, 2015
5 pages. "[GASB] Statement No. 68 became effective for employer fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2014 ... Incorporating the requirements of Statement No. 68 will be a significant change to pension accounting and reporting by state and local governments. The purpose of this memo is to assist governmental employers that sponsor or contribute to a pension plan by providing an overview of the prior-period adjustment necessary to transition their financial statements from Statement No. 27 to Statement No. 68."

MORE >>

5.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
Mar. 9, 2014
"Fully funding retiree healthcare benefits increases cash contributions by 103 percent from $1.78 billion to $3.62 billion; however, the result is a smaller increase in the expected balance sheet liability at fiscal year end 2014. Under the full funding scenario, the balance sheet liability is expected to increase from $16.12 billion at fiscal year end 2013 to $16.42 billion at fiscal year end 2014. The partial funding policy also controls the growth in the balance sheet liability and reduces the expected balance sheet liability at fiscal year end 2014 by approximately 8 percent from $19.46 billion to $17.81 billion."

MORE >>

6.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
Nov. 8, 2013
"The limits are located in various sections of the Code and often apply in different ways to private and public-sector plans.... The table [in this memo] presents the key limits for 2014 and compares them with the 2013 limits. The remainder of this memo briefly describes these limits."

MORE >>

7.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
Sept. 30, 2013
"According to the 2013 Gray Book [of the American Academy of Actuaries]... the early retirement reduction factor and the optional form factor apply to the accrued benefit (rather than the formula benefit), which must be limited to the Section 415(b) limit applicable at the plan's normal retirement age.... [This] interpretation ... could significantly and unexpectedly limit the benefits that plans can pay to some participants. Although the Gray Book is not authoritative, it does reflect the views of certain U.S. Treasury and IRS staff."

MORE >>

8.  Burypensions Blog Link to more items from this source
Aug. 8, 2013
"The Milliman report criticizing assumptions used by Detroit's erstwhile actuaries Gabriel Roeder Smith & Company (GRS), whose reports showed Detroit's plans to be among the healthier public plans in the nation, kicked off with a scathing indictment of mortality assumptions used by GRS which Milliman characterizes as too 'optimistic'. You tell a layman that mortality assumptions are 'optimistic' and the assumption would be that people are living longer but in the perverted world of public pension funding an optimistic assumption (and they're all optimistic) is one that lowers costs and having retirees die sooner is good news."

MORE >>

9.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
May 16, 2013
"[T]he Indirect Employer Group Waiver (EGWP) with Wrap arrangement, using a Standard Medicare Part D plan design and a second plan that wraps around the EGWP [can produce] annual savings [of] as much as $600 per person greater than under the Retiree Drug Subsidy. However, effective communication with participating retirees is essential for its success."

MORE >>

10.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company in Government Finance Review Link to more items from this source
Apr. 24, 2013
"[N]umerous state and local governments have recently made significant changes to their retirement plans in order to manage their costs including, in two very recent cases, establishing cash balance plans. However, if these new designs are used, care should be taken that the implications are fully understood and that they are effective in attracting and retaining qualified employees and providing sufficient and sustainable retirement benefits."

MORE >>

11.  PolitiFact.com Link to more items from this source
Jan. 6, 2013

"Is Wisconsin's pension system the only one in the nation that's fully funded? ...For the official 2010 and 2011 Wisconsin figures, we turned to a report by the Wisconsin Retirement System's actuarial consultant, which annually calculates the funded ratio. The firm, Gabriel Roeder Smith & Company, reported 99.8 percent funding for year-end 2010. And for year-end 2011, the firm put the Wisconsin fund's funded ratio at 99.9 percent, according to its latest report. The report showed the Wisconsin system at 99 percent or greater since 2003.... It's slightly below 100%, but so close that a respected research organization rounds it up. And no other plan covering general state employees can make that claim."  MORE >>

12.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
Oct. 28, 2012
"This [article] offers a detailed explanation of the changes that apply to public pension plans and to the employers (and nonemployers) who contribute to the plans. In addition, it concisely summarizes the key changes in four tables[.]"

MORE >>

13.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
July 22, 2012
"The GASB's new standards make significant changes to pension accounting and reporting by state and local governments. While the current standards provide a close link between pension accounting and funding measures, the new standards disconnect accounting and funding in several ways ... Overall, these changes will likely make the new pension accounting measures more volatile than the funding measures. It should be noted that the GASB's changes do not affect the actuarial methods and assumptions used to determine the contributions needed to fund the plan."

MORE >>

14.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
May 11, 2012
Slides used in a presentation by a prominent actuarial firm with a large public plan practice, from the 2010 National Conference on Public Employees Retirement Systems.

MORE >>

15.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
Feb. 27, 2012
This is an analysis of the 2011 Valuation.

MORE >>

16.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
Feb. 27, 2012
The valuation was based on census information as of June 30, 2011, and measures actuarial liabilities as of June 30, 2011. The report includes expense and financial reporting information applicable to fiscal year end June 30, 2012, and a projection of annual expense for fiscal year end June 30, 2013.

MORE >>

17.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
Jan. 26, 2012

These funding principles can be thought of in a risk-management framework. In an effort to keep the employer's pension contribution relatively stable from year to year, a funding policy should: (1) identify keyrisk areas that add to contribution volatility and (2) identify ways to manage each of those risks. The primary risk areas in funding retirement systems are investment risks, demographic risks within the covered population, benefit or plan design risks, and governance risks.  MORE >>

18.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Link to more items from this source
July 26, 2011
This article focuses on the GASB's proposed changes. However, to present the changes in context, the article begins by providing background on state and local government pensions and summarizing the GASB's current pension standards.

MORE >>

19.  Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company and National Association of State Retirement Administrators Link to more items from this source
Mar. 17, 2006
7 pages. Excerpt: [Regarding] remarks to the State and Local Government Pension Forum on February 28 [the authors] recognize [Mr. Moskow's] concerns about public pension funding and the potentially large liabilities related to retiree health care benefits.

MORE >>

20.  National Council on Teacher Retirement Link to more items from this source
Mar. 16, 2005
2 pages. Excerpt: Paul Zorn of Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company, which is an NCTR member, summarizes here the new required notice of rights and duties under USERRA.

MORE >>

   Next »

Here's Help About the Advanced Features That Apply Whenever "All Words" Is Selected in the Search Form

  • Quotation marks have a special meaning when "All Words" is selected in the search form (instead of "Any Word"). Any group of words surrounded by quotation marks is required to be found exactly as they appear, in order for a news item to be a match (in other words, they denote an exact phrase).

    Example. "standard of review"
  • By default, every word must be found in a matching news item (hence the "All Words" nomenclature) unless you include the word "or" (whether or not capitalized). A news item is a match if it has one (or both) of the words on either side of "or".

    Example. vested OR vesting
    Note: This can bite you unexpectedly because the word "or" always triggers that functionality. You'll need to refrain from using the word "or" if you want a fully reliable result that matches "all words."
  • The left parenthesis and right parenthesis have a special meaning because they essentially turn multiple words into a single word equivalent. This is handy for words that are synonyms, whether grammatically or in industry usage.

    Example. If this were entered in the search form, a matching news item would need to contain either the word "vested" or the word "lifetime" (anywhere in the news item), plus the word retirement (anywhere in the news item), plus either the word "benefits" or the word "coverage" (anywhere in the news item):
    (vested OR lifetime) retirement (benefits OR coverage)

    You can separate sets of parentheses (or single words) with the word "AND," whether or not capitalized, if you prefer clarity (but this is not necessary because "and" is assumed when "All Words" is selected in the search form):
    (vested OR lifetime) AND retirement AND (benefits or coverage)

  • The word "not" has a special meaning because a news item will not match if it contains the word that follows the word "not" (whether or not capitalized).

    Example. A way to find news items about recently required plan document amendments, while excluding older items about the amendments that were required for certain laws enacted in 1982 or 1984, would be:
    (amended OR amendments OR restated OR restatement) NOT (TEFRA OR DEFRA OR REA)
    Note: This can bite you unexpectedly because the word "not" always triggers that functionality. You'll need to refrain from using the word "not" if you want a fully reliable result that matches "all words."

[Return to the Search Form]