Jump to content

    Cost of Limited Partnership

    kocak
    By kocak,

    Any ideas on how to determine the cost of a limited partnership for the attachment to Schedule H? I know the initial investment and the number of units held. I don't know how the distributions each year affect my original investment cost. Thanks.

    mck


    2001 RMD proposed regs and 403(b) plans

    John A
    By John A,

    Do the 2001 Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) proposed regulations apply to RMDs from 403(B) plans in 2001? For 401(k) and other qualified plans, a model amendment is provided, but it does not appear that any similar amendment is available to 403(B) plans. Does this mean that 403(B) plans must use the "old" rules for 2001, but the "new" rules for 2002?


    Participant count for frozen 401(k) plan?

    John A
    By John A,

    How is the participant count determined for a frozen 401(k) plan? Can all employees who have not met the eligibility requirements and reached an entry date as of the date of the freeze be ignored?


    Self insured employer health plan - bankrupt

    Guest prucker
    By Guest prucker,

    Does an employee of a company with a self insured health insurance plan have any protection when they have incurred medical bills thinking that they had coverage and find out two months later the plan and employer are filing bankruptcy? The providers all verified coverage, but were denied payment and now they are billing the employee. The employee had medical premiums deducted from his paycheck. Thanks for any suggestions.


    Unitizing Investments in Employer Stock

    Kirk Maldonado
    By Kirk Maldonado,

    Are there any hidden problems when investments in employer stock are done on a unitized basis?

    The third party administrator is pushing for it, so that it can use daily valuation for all of the investment vehicles available under the plan.

    While I am not overly enamored with unitizing investments in employer stock, it seems to be particularly appropriate where the stock is thinly traded, so that purchases and sales could not be always effected as soon as possible after the plan receives the investment directions without having a significant impact on the stock price.

    It does seem that it is vital that the plan clearly communicate to employees that:

    1. the value of their units will directly correspond to the value of the stock (e.g., because of the cash that will also be

    held in the fund); and

    2. sales and purchases will not be made at the trading price on the day on which their investment directions are given to the plan.

    Does anybody have any thoughts on this topic that they would like to share?


    ERISA protection for PS/MP

    Guest geo
    By Guest geo,

    I am self employed and do not have, or ever had, any employees. I have a money purchase, profit sharing plan (paired plan formerly Keogh). Since this is a "qualified" plan it is my understanding that these assets are protected from creditors under ERISA. Is that correct? I have been told yes and I have been told no because I have never had any employees. Thank you.


    Safe harbor design

    Guest Christie Banks
    By Guest Christie Banks,

    I am setting up a new plan. The employer wants to have two matches in the plan - one that satisfies the basic safe harbor match (100% of first 3% and 50% of the next 2%), and one that is a discretionary match. The basic safe harbor match will be 100% vested, and the discretionary match will be subject to a 5 year vesting schedule (20% a year). Does having that second discretionary match cause problems in falling under the safe harbor rules? Will the ADP/ACP tests need to be run?


    Prior Year Sep Contributions

    Guest dmrrtr
    By Guest dmrrtr,

    What is the deadline date for contributing to a Sep IRA as a prior year contribution?


    Prior Year Sep Contributions

    Guest dmrrtr
    By Guest dmrrtr,

    Up until when can I make a prior year sep contribution?


    Accrual of Benefits after going into pay status

    Guest Dayon
    By Guest Dayon,

    In a DB Plan if a participant returns to work after going into pay status (collecting retirement benefit) and meets all eligibility requirements for the plan would the monthly benefit then be adjusted according to the extra years of service and salary amounts seeing that the benefit amount is solely based on these two items? In the plan document the only provision that even comes close to answering this question is under Suspension of payments...which by the way are not allowed. The Employer is not even sure of the answer! This is my first year administering this plan and I can not find anything to support an answer.


    Reporting-Desingated Fianancial Institution

    Felicia
    By Felicia,

    We are a designated financial institution that uses the IRS Model Form 5305-SIMPLE. Therefore we are obligated to file reports with employers by October so that the employer can distribute materials to their employers. One way (and the simpliest) is to send the employer a copy of the IRS Model Form with the Model Notification to Eligible Employees and the Model Salary Reduction Agreement. Based on these documents the employees make decisions as to how much they will contribute next year.

    The model forms have not been updated for EGTRRA (compensation and salary deferral limits).

    Has anyone heard when and if the IRS will be updating these forms in time for financial institutions to meet their obligations?

    Will the dates be extended until the IRS does publish model language? If the IRS doesl not publish in the near future, can we change the Model Notification to Eligible Employees and Model Salary Reduction Agreement to reflect the new limits?

    I'd also like to hear how other financial institutions are planning on handling this.


    Retroactive plan amendments?

    John A
    By John A,

    Can either of the following situations be corrected by retroactive plan amendment:

    1) In a 401(k) plan, deferrals were limited to 2% - 15% of compensation. Plan document did not specify the 2% minimum.

    2) Plan was valued quarterly. Plan document specified annual valuation and did not give the option of other valuation dates.

    In both cases, the plan has been operated consistently for ten years or so.

    If retroactive plan amendments cannot be done, what would the corrections be?

    What IRS program under Rev. Proc. 2001-17 would be used?


    Eligibility on Merged plans

    Nate X
    By Nate X,

    Plan A has an eligibility of 3 months. Plan B has an eligibility of 1 year. Plan A wants to merge into Plan B (Company B bought Company A). Some participant's in Plan A won't be eligible for Plan B. Does the Employer have the option to let those who met the eligibility requirements in plan A, but not plan B to continue to defer after the merger? Any one know where this is discussed?


    Non-COBRA small employer acquired by employer subject to COBRA

    Guest Kathleen Meagher
    By Guest Kathleen Meagher,

    Employer A with eleven employees is acquired by an employer B with 500 employees. A's health plan will terminate at the time of the acquisition. Two former employees of A currently have state "COBRA" coverage. Are these former employees of A entitled to COBRA under B's plan? What about employees of A that are not hired by B after the acquisition?

    I think B's plan must cover both groups--any other opinions?

    Kathleen Meagher


    Retiree funding for health insurance

    Guest Mtn 401k Cons
    By Guest Mtn 401k Cons,

    A municipality (city) client wants to know if it is possible to set up a vehicle (such as a trust) that will accept pre-tax contributions from retirees that will be used to pay for their health insurance premiums. Please advise on how this might be done and, if possible, who I might go to directly for assistance.

    Thanks


    Partnership fee deductions

    PJaeger
    By PJaeger,

    I have a partnership where the partners charge the fees against their individual accounts or pay the fee personally because they all have different balances. The individual partners who pay their fee personally are taking the deduction as fee for investment management which is subject to the 2% floor on the Schedule A of form 1040.

    The partnership pays the fee for the non-partners.

    Can anyone tell me if the partnership paid the expenses for all participants, could the fees be allocated as business expenses to the individual partners for there proportionate share?

    If this can be done, it would reduce the amount of self-employment income and therefore reduce the self-employment tax the partners pay.


    annuity experts out there?

    Belgarath
    By Belgarath,

    Here's a good one! A participant in a 457 plan died. 60 years old. Spouse is sole beneficiary. An insurance agent read that you could roll 457 to IRA now, but didn't realize that you couldn't until 2002. The 457 plan was funded with a deferred annuity.

    What they now want is to 1035 exchange the annuity in the 457 plan to a new annuity, in the name of the Trustee of the 457 plan, but with the deceased as annuitant! Then in 2002, the 457 Trustee, acting upon the instructions of the spouse beneficiary, will roll the money to an IRA in the name of the spouse.

    I don't have a problem with the second part of the transaction, but how the heck can you do a 1035 exchange when the annuitant is deceased? (The logical approach, to me at least, if the 457 Trustee agrees, is to keep the money there until 2002, then just do a rollover.)


    qualified plan with only one named employee

    Guest Diane DuFresne
    By Guest Diane DuFresne,

    Just came across a 401(k) plan sponsored by a housing association that defines "employee" specifically by name (one individual). The term participant is defined as an employee who satisfies the eligibility requirements. Consequently, this plan was specifically written for one named employee of the association.

    This employee is not a highly compensated individual (no highly compensated individuals are employed by the association).

    As this plan does not benefit any HCE's , it is deemed to satisfy the minimum coverage requriements of 410(B).

    However, I am still having a hard time letting this plan design pass my "sniff" test. I can "discriminate" as much as I like within the NHCE classification? There are 6 other NHCE's that are employed by the association.

    Any thoughts on this plan design would be appreciated.


    Schedule D, PSA

    Guest jim williams
    By Guest jim williams,

    Would mutual funds be considered Pooled Separate Accounts that are required to be reported on Schedule D? Or is a Pooled Separate Account an invested solely offered by the insurance company?


    cash balance annuity conversion

    Gary
    By Gary,

    A cash balance plan defines act equiv to be

    30 yr treasury and gatt for lump sums and

    71GAM, 7%, otherwise

    They say that to convert cash balance account to annuity you divide by an annuity factor based on the 30 year treasury rate, but give no specific mortality table.

    Question is - what mortality table s/b used or is most reasonable?

    If the 71GAM is used, this results in a lower annuity factor and thus a larger accrued benefit and potentially larger lump sum. i.e. larger than account balance.


Portal by DevFuse · Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use