Jump to content

    1,000 hours, last day employment 401(k) requirement

    bitto86
    By bitto86,

    After a bit of Google research, I see that this is sometimes a requirement for highly compensated employees (HCEs) such as myself.  This is the same language in my employer's 401(k) summary plan description document.  As an HCE, I will have worked well over 1,000 hours and will be employed on December 31, 2020.

    If, on January 4, 2021, I inform my employer that I am quitting, will I lose my 401(k) match (which will be paid out at the end of January 2021), even though I satisfied the requirements for 2020?  Assume that the employer will be paying out the match to all other HCEs who remain employed, are not quitting, and satisfied the 1,000 hour and last day rule for 2020.
     
    In other words, is there another subjective, discretionary "you must also still be employed when we declare/pay your match" requirement that the employer can arbitrarily use to deny me my 2020 match?
     
    I don't see any language in the document to this effect, but it says I am merely "eligible" to receive the match - does this mean the employer can arbitrarily say "nope!" after I quit in early January?

    Timing of 457(f) Taxation

    kgr12
    By kgr12,

    Does the short term deferral rule offer the flexibility to determine the year in which a 457(f) benefit is taxed? For example, if the benefit "vests" in April 2020, and is distributed to the participant on March 10, 2021, is the benefit taxed in 2020 or 2021?


    SIMPLE IRA - VCP

    Scuba 401
    By Scuba 401,

    client started a 401(k) in the same year and also excluded employees from a member of a controlled group.  VCP says basically for the first issue you just file the vcp and ask the IRS to allow the contributions to stay in the plan.  However you also have to  deal with the people you excluded and make a corrective contribution.  Would IRS want you to make a corrective contribution for the improperly excluded employees to a plan the employer shouldn't have had?  


    PT/Disqualified person

    Scuba 401
    By Scuba 401,

    Facts: A is a minority shareholder - 1% of a company B. A Runs a TPA/service provider and wants to provide services to Company B's retirement plan.  does this fall under the standard service provider exception?  


    Final Year of Plan

    thepensionmaven
    By thepensionmaven,

    We're terminating a defined benefit plan, the checks are written to the rollover institutions, all sent prior to 12/31/20.

    It is my understanding that the plan can not be closed and a 'final 5500" prepared until either IRAs have been established or the participant cashes a check and the 20% withholding has been paid.

    So, 1099s can only be prepared for 2020 only if the plan funds were deposited into IRAs mor cashed their checks in 2020; if done January, 2021 has to be a 2021 1099R.

    Correct???


    Tax on reversions per Section 4980 -- Handling unallocated amounts until termination of a replacement plan

    Draper55
    By Draper55,

    Does Internal Revenue Code section 4980(d)(2)(C)(iv) ("Unallocated amounts at termination" of a replacement plan into which assets have been transferred) imply that if the amount of the transfer is not allocated by the end of the 7-year period referred to in 4980(d)(2)(C)(i) that it can continue to be allocated, until the termination of the replacement plan?

    For example, in an owner-and-spouse-only scenario, if you need more than 7 years to allocate due to the 415(c) limitations, you could continue this for additional years as necessary as long as the plan is open and there is participant compensation to allocate it against?


    Funding of a SH Match True Up

    justatester
    By justatester,

    If a plan funds the match on a per payroll period, but the "computation/determination" period is annual per document,  we calculated a "true up" calculation.  The clients now owes additional 2019 SH Match.  What happens if this amount is not funded by 12/31/2020?  I can only find reference to it must be funded, but no real answer as to what if not funded.

     


    PS effect of not maxing deferral in non-calendar yr plan

    AlbanyConsultant
    By AlbanyConsultant,

    I'm looking at a PYE 9/30 401k/PS plan, and for the first time, the deferrals for the owner (who is 50+) are substantially lower then they have been in the past:

    10/1/19 - 12/31/19: $2,200
    1/1/20 - 9/30/20: $16,800
    10/1/20 - 12/31/20: not received from client yet

    He wants to max his profit sharing for the 9/30/20 PYE in his cross-tested plan.

    What is his DC allocation limit for the plan year?  I know, without that last bit of information there's no exact answer yet, but this is why I hate off-calendar 401k plans.  Does he have to actually have deferrals over $19,500 in calendar 2020 to take advantage of the catch-up provision?  Meaning if he deferred $4,000 in the last quarter of 2020 for a total of $20,800, would his limit be $58,300?

    Thanks, and happy holidays!


    Match Question - LLC Taxed as Partnership Owned by 3 S-Corps.

    Malcolm
    By Malcolm,

    The plan sponsor for a law firm 401k plan is set up as an LLC taxed as a partnership - equally owned (1/3) by three different Affiliated/Participating employers all taxed as an S-corp. The LLC employees a few non-owners, and each of the 3 S-corp partners are 100% owners of his or her respective firm. 

    Since the three affiliated, participating employers (S-Corps) pay their owners W-2 compensation, the W-2 compensations are eligible for deferrals and contributions for the plan. For Pre-tax deferral contributions, payroll deductions are withheld for the owners (W-2 comp) and funded by the individual S-corp. It's a Safe Harbor match plan with a Plan Year/annual determination period for the match. 

    Since the pre-tax deferral contribution will be deducted via payroll and funded from the owners' individual S-corp, does the corresponding Safe Harbor match need to also be funded from the individual S-corp. - or does the match need to be funded by the LLC taxed as a partnership?


    to vest or not to vest - DC plan

    Jakyasar
    By Jakyasar,

    Hi

    Participant was paid out (force out) her balance a few weeks ago (terminated in 2018 - never provided the completed distribution election forms). The balance was less than $500 and had 100% vested safe harbor and 50% vested profit sharing portions. 50% of the forfeited profit sharing account was transferred to "forfeiture account".

    Plan's limit is $1000 for involuntary payout.

    Now sponsor decided to terminate the plan, effective 12/31/2020. Resolution states, "the accounts of the participants will be 100% as of the plan termination date". It is signed today.

    Language from the document "in event of termination of the plan, the account balance of each affected participant will be nonforfeitable"

    Do I need to go back and vest the participant 100%?

    Thank you


    Deferrals to (now terminated) Simple IRA not deposited

    DSev
    By DSev,

    The employer withheld deferrals for a small handful of participants and failed to deposit them in 2019 when the employer had a Simple IRA for it's employees. The Simple IRA was terminated at the end of 2019. The employer began sponsoring a 401(k) plan in late 2020. The employer discovered the deferrals withheld for the Simple IRA were never deposited and wishes to correct the error.

    What is the proper correction for deferrals withheld under a plan that has since been terminated? Can the deferrals withheld under the Simple IRA and their associated lost earnings be deposited to the 401(k) the employer now sponsors?

     

    Sorry if this is a simple one. I searched a bit through questions and didn't find a similar problem addressed.


    Association MEP Eligible Employer

    Purplemandinga
    By Purplemandinga,

    An Association MEP exists of businesses that operate stores of a certain retailer. These stores sell products. One of its participating employers is in a controlled group with a business that cleans pools as a service but is not a member of the retail association that sponsors the MEP and couldn't be a member based on the association bylaws.

    Would the fact that a controlled group exists and the plan document automatically pulls in related group members allow this pool cleaning business to participate in the MEP that it otherwise wouldn't be eligible to participate in? Is anything violated by allowing this?


    CG Employer never adopted the plan, but participated

    BG5150
    By BG5150,

    Controlled group with 4 companies.  Only 3 of them adopted the plan, but all four companies are participating.

    Can we do a retroactive amendment having the missing company adopt the plan back to 2013?


    Discovered Mistake After Rollover

    sam248
    By sam248,

    Hi --

    I am looking for advice and/or information.  Here is the situation.  Former employee requests 401K rollover on 12/4/19.  On 12/31/19, funds are erroneously applied to their account.  On 1/16/20 owner of the company approves rollover (signing section 11 of the rollover forms).  All funds (including those erroneously applied) are transferred.  Third-party administration company review discovers the overfunding.  Former employer/company sends notice to former address but former employee does not receive.  Former employer/company hires debt collector to obtain the overfunded amount.

    Questions:

    1. Does the signed approval to rollover the funds by the owner mean that all the funds (including those erroneously overfunded) are essentially now the former employees?

    2. If not, don't these funds need to be transferred back through rollover and not provided to a third-party debt collector through a cash payment?

    3. What happens if the funds have lost their value in the stock market since they were incorrectly transferred?

    4. Should the former employee have to pay interest to the debt collector on these funds?

    Any advice for the former employee?  Because yes, that is me.

     


    Which is better: a State-run IRA program, or a 401(k) plan?

    Peter Gulia
    By Peter Gulia,

    Consider this not-entirely-imaginary work setting:

     

    The employer has no retirement plan, and no payroll practice for retirement contributions.

     

    The employer wants to allow its employees to save for retirement, but will provide no nonelective or matching contribution.

     

    None of the employees, including the deemed-employee business owner, wants to save (and none can afford to save) more than an amount within the IRA contribution limit.

     

    The business owner is the only worker who would be treated as a highly-compensated employee.

     

    This small-business employer and its startup plan would have no purchasing power in negotiating fees for a retirement plan’s investments or services.  So, assume a recordkeeper’s and other service providers’ rack rates.

     

    The employer is unwilling to pay any of the plan’s expenses; everything must be charged to participants’ accounts.

     

    The employer will not consider an employer-sponsored retirement plan unless the employer can arrange the maximum delegation of fiduciary responsibilities—a pooled-employer plan or, for a single-employer plan, using a § 3(16) administrator, a § 3(38) investment manager (to select the plan’s investment alternatives), and a trustee, with all those services paid from participants’ accounts.

     

    All employees live and work in a State that offers a State-run payroll-deduction program for IRA contributions.  The program allows Roth and non-Roth contributions.

     

    The State’s arrangements cap the expenses of the State-run IRA program at 100 basis points (expressed yearly) of accounts’ assets.

     

    This employer asks for your unbiased advice about whether it should arrange a 401(k) plan, or join the State-run IRA program.

     

    Which do you advise, and what reasoning do you explain to support your advice?

     


    COBRA HMO Moving to New State

    Sharkano
    By Sharkano,

    I have seen various posts that say that if you have an HMO and leave employment to go to another state where the HMO would be useless, that if the employer has a more standard plan they offer to employees that would give you benefits, COBRA requires the employer allow you to switch plans even if not a normal open enrollment period.  However, I have never seen a cite to a statute or regulation that says this.  Anyone have any idea where I can point the employer to?  Thanks! 


    Forgot to take tax deduction for SEP contribution

    arthurkagan
    By arthurkagan,

    Owner has S Corporation, and takes W-2 pay annually.   Only other employee of corporation is wife, who also receives W-2.    Owner made SEP contributions for several past years, but did not take tax deduction on corporate tax return.  

    Can owner prepare revised tax returns for past year to claim deduction. 

    Can owner take tax deduction in current year for past years accumulated missed tax deductions; i. e. can it be carried forward.   

    What other options are available to capture past years missed tax deductions

    Suppose in one of the past years, the SEP contribution was greater than 25% of the W-2 amount, or exceeded the dollar limit for SEP contributions.    Can the excess be carried forward.  


    Happy holidays

    Jakyasar
    By Jakyasar,

    To all

    Wishing you all happy holidays and a healthy New Year.

    This board has been a wealth of information with many different contributors sharing their knowledge and experiences.

    Thank you all


    Can Contributions Continue To SIMPLE IRA If Spouse Sponsors 401(k)?

    mming
    By mming,

    Husband and wife each own a business.  The businesses are unrelated and are not members of a controlled group or ASG.  The wife has a SIMPLE IRA.  The husband wants to sponsor a 401(k) plan and exclude the wife.  Is there anything preventing the wife from contributing to her SIMPLE IRA after the husband's 401(k) plan is established? 


    Revoke 2021 SH Match Notice & Contribution

    susieQ
    By susieQ,

    A Safe harbor Match plan distributed a SH notice for 2021 but now, (12/23/20) would like to rescind the notice, NOT make a SH Match in 2021.  Does the plan need to follow the 30 day notice rules and actually begin SH Match January 2021 or does it make a difference that the year for which the SH Match was promised has not yet started?  


Portal by DevFuse · Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use