Bill Presson

Correct. Updated info goes in 1 & 2 and old info in 4a and b.

This just doesn't seem rational to me. Whatever/whomever precipitated the death, the coroner/medical examiner is going to determine the cause during the autopsy. And no police dept is going to just throw up their hands and say we may never know. Was it natural causes or did she just lose her balance? Or was there foul play? Regardless of that, the ME is going to complete the death certificate with something more than pending. Weird vibes on this.

Do those "standardized" prototype documents even exist in the wild anymore? I haven't seen one in years.

Rollover first? Or RMD first? Because the RMD has to come out if the participant will reach RMD age during the Distribution Calendar Year.

Just make sure the earnings for the HCEs are prior year since that's how the status is determined.

Damn.

For 2024 RMDs, Roth is excluded.

No.

Paul was more specific, but a corrective amendment for that one person is what I meant because I thought that's what you had said.

Why? Because that’s the solution.

You're reading the instructions correctly for the line. But, it's the number on line 5c(1) that determines whether you need an audit or not.

Might be an issue if the audit wasn't submitted with the original 5500-SF (and I'm not sure how it could have been). The amendment might generate a rejection letter for an incomplete filing in this case.

No, as long as the proper deadlines are met.

In my work with many professional service firms, they do these kinds of non qualified deferred comp programs quite often. Usually the partner will "retire" as a partner and continue working for 2-5 years. Those plans would almost always use 3401(a) as the definition of compensation because those non qualified distributions are considered earned income in that definition. Allows the former partner to still defer into the 401(k) plan if desired.

Owner only plans aren’t subject to ERISA Title I so 8955-SSA isn’t applicable.

Sent

But that one dealt with incidental limits in a DC plan and the impact that rollover funds might play. DB plans were never mentioned. Sorry that I’ve stepped away. I will send it to you this evening.

I've got the other infamous one, but not that one. Maybe Lance Wallach has it? 😁

@Peter Gulia if I can't rant on message boards, where shall I rant?

I'll never understand why M&A attorneys aren't sued for ignoring retirement plan issues prior to the transaction date.

If it's offered, then you do have to offer it to all. But it's not a protected benefit so you don't have to offer it forever. Get the current people to sign off on not wanting insurance and then amend it out for future offering.

I think you could have stopped offering it as an option years ago. But, as you said, most people don't do this purchase in their plans anymore. Typically, the policies would have been purchased, paid for 5-8 years and then sold out of the plan. If they didn't do that, they probably didn't think it through OR the agent didn't care about the plan to begin with. At some point, assuming the guy retires, the policy will have to be surrendered or he'll have to buy it out. Is there any good reason to keep the policy in place any longer? If not, surrender it and put everyone out of their misery.

Remember that I am not an investment person, but a few thoughts: 1. doing something "for investment purposes" doesn't determine whether it's a PT or not. Might impact whether there is UBTI, but not PT. 2. I think allowing this investment as you describe it is a very, very bad idea. 3. Perhaps they could find a good REIT or ETF that would scratch this itch.

FWIW, this isn't me. 😁

1. You can’t close one 401(k) and open another less than 12 months apart for the same business (which this is because of controlled group rules). The real issue is whether the document allowed you to count any contributions from the new entity since it didn’t adopt the plan in 2022. That’s a document issue that Vanguard has to answer. 2. There’s a place on the 5500 to show that the prior 5500 was filed under a different EIN. 3. I recommend you hire someone that does this work and not try to resolve it yourselves.