401_noob
Inactive-
Posts
134 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by 401_noob
-
To clarify the above response, if matching contributions treated as an excess aggregate contribution are partially vested, the nonvested portion (including all allocable earnings on that portion) are forfeited instead of distributed.
-
The HCE would only forfeit their entire portion of the excess aggregate contribution if they are 0% vested in the ER match source. Hope this helps!
-
Employer failed to withhold 401k pre and after tax contribution
401_noob replied to vickystamford's topic in 401(k) Plans
In addition to what Karonline provided above, here is the IRS' new method for correcting deferral errors. https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/new-methods-for-correcting-elective-deferral-errors Under the new method the Employer may or may not have to make the QNEC depending on how quickly they re-implement your pre-tax elections & provide you the notice described in Appendix A of Rev Proc 2015-28, but you should still get a matching contribution equal to the match that would have been received had your pre-tax deferral been withheld. -
Good morning, I was wondering what other practitioners are doing regarding the calculation of the excise tax for failing to correct ADP/ACP failure prior to the 2 1/2 month deadline. The EOB says that the 10% tax is calculated on the excess deferral or excess aggregate contributions prior to the G/L adjustment, but the 5500 Preparer's Manual says that the tax is calculated after the earnings adjustment. So are your calculating the tax before or after the G/L adjustment? Thanks in advance!
-
Hey Y'all! Quick question for my fellow practitioners. I am studying the DC-2 book to eventually get my QKA and I came across a sentence saying that corrective distributions (ADP & ACP corrections) are subject to 10% withholding unless the participant completes a Form W-4P. I was wondering who all was practicing this? I don't recall ever seeing a corrective distribution with any withholding applied in my short tenure. Thanks in advance!!
- 2 replies
-
- withholding
- corrective distributions
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Late Discretionary Matching Contribution
401_noob replied to ratherbereading's topic in 401(k) Plans
Maybe that is just for SH Matching contributions now that I think about it... but if it is good enough for a SH match, why wouldn't it be good enough for a discretionary match? -
Late Discretionary Matching Contribution
401_noob replied to ratherbereading's topic in 401(k) Plans
When was the match deposited because I thought that if a match is allocated on a pay period basis then it has to be deposited by the end of the following quarter? -
Attribution from a Trust to its beneficiaries
401_noob replied to 401_noob's topic in Retirement Plans in General
Thank you both for your input!! -
Attribution from a Trust to its beneficiaries
401_noob posted a topic in Retirement Plans in General
Greetings friends! I have a question regarding the attribution from a grantor trust to the beneficiaries of the Trust. The EOB says that if a trust has an ownership interest in another organization, that interest is attributed to the beneficiaries in the trust who have a 5% or more actuarial interest in the trust, in proportion to each beneficiary's actuarial interest. What is actuarial interest and how is it determined? I found in S. Derrin Watson's Who's the Employer Q&A column, question 167- https://benefitslink.com/cgi-bin/qa.cgi?db=qa_who_is_employer&n=167, that it is determined according to IRS actuarial tables, but what table and how? Any help would be appreciated!! Thanks in advance! -
Or FAB 2008-04 Q41 https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/employers-and-advisers/guidance/field-assistance-bulletins/2008-04
-
I suspected that it would be an operational error at the very least. Thank you both for your input!
- 11 replies
-
- force out
- receivable
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I have a question related to this topic. If the AA says that the mandatory distribution will occur in the next plan year quarter following severance from employment, does that mean that the Plan only has a three month window to process the mandatory distribution? For example, if the participant terminates 6/15/17, does the Plan only have from 7/1/17-9/30/17 to process the mandatory distribution after providing them with the necessary notice(s)? What happens if it isn't processed by 9/30, can it be processed at a later date?
- 11 replies
-
- force out
- receivable
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
FWIW, this is what the EOB says: Part G., Distributing too much Suppose the plan distributes more than is required to correct the ADP test or ACP test? An overpayment is an operational violation of the terms of the plan and can be a potentially disqualifying event. The plan should take reasonable steps to get repayment of the overpayment. The HCE could remit the excess payment back to the plan or might work out an arrangement to have the overpayment withheld from his next paycheck. Relief under the IRS' Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) is available. EPCRS is explained in Part B of Section VI of Chapter 15.
-
Tom Poje answered the first question in this thread: Hope that helps!!
-
well Belgarath answered my question as i was typing...
- 9 replies
-
- exclusions
- employees
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I thought that ERISA 204(h) only applied to Pension Plans.
- 9 replies
-
- exclusions
- employees
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Here is an old thread that may be useful:
-
Wouldn't it depend on whether the Plan terminated with or without cause since one of the requirements of being a Safe Harbor is that it has to be in place for 12 months? I am assuming that you are relying on the SH to get a TH pass since you mentioned that the only contributions have been/will be deferrals and SH match. Hope that there aren't any forfeitures.
-
I thought that a 401(k) plan could only be deemed frozen if it applied for a determination letter after terminating and the process took longer than the 12 month period to pay out assets. Are there other instances in which a 401(k) plan can freeze?
-
Do you know if it is possible to retroactively change the Plan termination date? For example if a sponsor terminated a plan effective 8/31/16, could they now say that the Plan is terminated effective 12/31/16? I am not aware of any provision, but perhaps someone here is. I do know that choosing the effective date is a settlor function, but i don't know if that means that it can be changed. Thanks!
-
I've always known it to be a requirement for the SAR. This link has an explanation beginning on the very bottom of the left hand side and going over to the top right hand side on the first page. It explains that Except with respect to qualifying employer securities, participant loans and qualifying self-directed accounts, the name of each regulated financial institution holding (or issuing) qualifying plan assets and the amount of such assets reported by the institution as of the end of the plan year; http://www.asppa.org/Portals/2/PDFs/Board of Directors/00-38.pdf
-
Bond Requirement - ER (not public) stock in plan
401_noob replied to John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA's topic in 401(k) Plans
So i just read § 2520.104-46 and it didn't describe non-qualifying assets, but it did say that ER securities, as defined in §407d-5 are qualified assets. (ii) For purposes of paragraph (b)(1), the term “qualifying plan assets” means: (A) Qualifying employer securities, as defined in section 407(d)(5) of the Act and the regulations issued thereunder;- 5 replies
-
- robs
- employer securities
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bond Requirement - ER (not public) stock in plan
401_noob replied to John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA's topic in 401(k) Plans
For what its worth, FAB 2008-04 says that non-qualifying assets which require the additional 100% bonding are described in 29 C.F.R. § 2520.104-46. It goes on to provide this FAQ link: https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/faqs/faq_auditwaiver.pdf- 5 replies
-
- robs
- employer securities
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
