Mike Preston
Silent Keyboards-
Posts
6,547 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
153
Everything posted by Mike Preston
-
Not true.How about everybody in their own group.
-
Controlled Group status (100% of Company A and 50% of company B)
Mike Preston replied to Sammiemor's topic in 401(k) Plans
Pet peeve: controlled group. No. -
Less than 20 hours a week excluded
Mike Preston replied to austin3515's topic in 403(b) Plans, Accounts or Annuities
This is but one scenario of many that are similar. Success through EPCRS depends on the employer establishing employee expectations consistent with exclusion. -
Percentage of trustee/participant directed 401k plans
Mike Preston replied to spiritrider's topic in 401(k) Plans
Me thinks you are suffering from tunnel vision. I'd love to put you and @LarryStarr in a small room and see who walks out. -
Participating Employers, employees and deferrals
Mike Preston replied to Pammie57's topic in 401(k) Plans
You follow the plan's terms to develop plan compensation. AOK to ignore loss if supported by plan documents. However, 415 comp includes all aggregated employers so that might end up forcing comp to be limited. -
VCP filing for incorrect match
Mike Preston replied to Santo Gold's topic in Correction of Plan Defects
I thought one of the requirements for use of VCP is to correct all instances of similar failures. -
Uh, that's the point!
-
Works 4 me.
-
There is so much disclarity in the first post I guess I just never saw that language as implying even more.
-
Did you mean "TH"? Either way, not if the document doesn't allow discretion.
-
Did somebody say differently?
-
Most outstanding! (Guitar riff...)
-
revisiting life insurance in combo plans
Mike Preston replied to Jakyasar's topic in Retirement Plans in General
Agreed. -
Famous last words.
-
revisiting life insurance in combo plans
Mike Preston replied to Jakyasar's topic in Retirement Plans in General
Not so fast. If this was a question for a client that was being audited and they'd already done this I would take the time to go into the archives wherever they may be and find the ask the experts session from asppa annual where Kyle from either treasury or IRS (i forget which) opined exactly the opposite. It was in response to a question that Larry Starr asked and after Kyle gave his unbelievable response Larry went back to the microphone and tried to convince him he didn't hear the question correctly. As I recall Kyle doubled down and basically said if you pass amounts testing even if you include the profit sharing to do so insurance in the defined benefit plan can be based solely on the normal retirement benefit payable in the defined benefit plan. Fwiw -
Just that the breakdown of deductions is probably more challenging than it should be. Need a good, detailed spreadsheet to make it all work. But, it should still be full speed ahead.
-
You are not.
-
While not totally off base, it is a complicated analysis. One thing I noticed is that you didn't limit gateway compensation to compensation earned while a participant. There are others. I don't have time to respond with a deep dive. Maybe somebody else can.
-
Each year stands on its own.
