Jump to content

Mike Preston

Silent Keyboards
  • Posts

    6,547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    153

Everything posted by Mike Preston

  1. Doesn't sound like the same thing to me. A fixed date is the same as a freeze. Your's is a not well disguised 410a violation.
  2. Yes, as long as the ABT is not needed to satisfy 410(b).
  3. No, but the valuation might recognize it.
  4. While no practical difference presumed AFTAP does not reduce by 10%.
  5. But it may be relevant in the context of future legislation.
  6. I would expect the letter to identify the form of authority being asserted. Then it's up to the plan administrator as to whether or not it's reasonable to accept.
  7. In the absence of receiving a letter informing the plan that the mailing address for the now deceased participant should be updated as indicated the 1099r goes to the same address the plan has in its official records.
  8. I do. Sounds like great fun.
  9. Please re-read the entire thread, because the above is not correct.
  10. I think there may be a cash flow PTE.
  11. CuseFan is right. The OP is applying the concept of vesting computation periods.
  12. Yeah, I'd love to see the ASOP 51 disclosure on one of these. $ to donuts they are taking the position that the deductible amount is the purview of somebody else. Nasty surprise awaits the client.
  13. Not that kind of pooled funds.
  14. You need to search this forum for a copy of Larry Starr's outline of this topic. In the case of a sole prop I usually start with the SE. But the doc might call for other adjustments. It can get complicated.
  15. Something does not make sense to me. Every davis-bacon plan I've ever worked on provided much more than top-heavy minimum to the davis-bacon participants. Otherwise it is not taking advantage of the davis-bacon provisions.???
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use