thepensionmaven Posted August 24, 2016 Posted August 24, 2016 We have a 401K safe harbor match 100% of the first 4% of W-2, sponsored my a mgmt company and including 10-11 subsidiaries. Combined there are over 100 employees. I would assume that after weeding out those who do not meet the age/service rests, if there are still over 100 eligibles, we would need an independent auditor report??
Bill Presson Posted August 24, 2016 Posted August 24, 2016 Depends on when the plan had over 100. If it's the first day of the first plan year, then yes. If it's not until the first day of a year after, then maybe not unless it's reached 120. But either way, the first sentence is irrelevant. RatherBeGolfing 1 William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
thepensionmaven Posted August 26, 2016 Author Posted August 26, 2016 Thank you. The CapA seems to think the reportof the investments is to be certified by either a bank or an insurance company prior to the CPA audit report. The investments are with New York Life, the firm that certified to the investments is the firm that prepares the reports and Schelues necessary for the preparation of the 5500s. Doesn't a bank or insuance company have to sign off on the investments held by the plan before CPA can certify the whole report?
BG5150 Posted August 26, 2016 Posted August 26, 2016 Depends on when the plan had over 100. If it's the first day of the first plan year, then yes. If it's not until the first day of a year after, then maybe not unless it's reached 120. But either way, the first sentence is irrelevant. OVER 120. GMK 1 QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
ESOP Guy Posted August 26, 2016 Posted August 26, 2016 Thank you. The CapA seems to think the reportof the investments is to be certified by either a bank or an insurance company prior to the CPA audit report. The investments are with New York Life, the firm that certified to the investments is the firm that prepares the reports and Schelues necessary for the preparation of the 5500s. Doesn't a bank or insuance company have to sign off on the investments held by the plan before CPA can certify the whole report? Your question is a bit hard to understand so I am making some assumptions in my answer. It sounds like the CPA is trying to do a Limited Scope Audit. In order to do that a qualified trustee or custodian has to certify the investment information. My understanding is only banks and insurance companies can be "qualified" for these purposes. Some reading: https://www.aicpa.org/interestareas/employeebenefitplanauditquality/resources/accountingandauditingresourcecenters/pages/limitedscopeauditsresourcecenter.aspx
Bill Presson Posted August 26, 2016 Posted August 26, 2016 Depends on when the plan had over 100. If it's the first day of the first plan year, then yes. If it's not until the first day of a year after, then maybe not unless it's reached 120. But either way, the first sentence is irrelevant. OVER 120. :-P William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now