Earl Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Plan has 21 & 12 for PS & SH Match but 3 months for 401k If the owner gets Profit Sharing does that eliminate the SH/TH exemption for the OE componant plan? (So the OE employees will need to get TH min is SH is less than 3% of pay) Thank you CBW
Mr Bagwell Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Earl, To answer in order.... Yes, the exemption is gone. Yes, the employees will need to get TH min if SH match is less than 3% of pay. Is this a cross tested plan?
ETA Consulting LLC Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 4 hours ago, Earl said: Plan has 21 & 12 for PS & SH Match but 3 months for 401k If the owner gets Profit Sharing does that eliminate the SH/TH exemption for the OE componant plan? (So the OE employees will need to get TH min is SH is less than 3% of pay) Thank you There is no TH exemption to begin with; regardless of any profit sharing contribution. Good Luck! CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
BG5150 Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 Quote There is no TH exemption to begin with; regardless of any profit sharing contribution. Why is that? "Exemption" might be the wrong word, but a plan that is solely funded with 401(k) and Safe Harbor under 401(k)(12) or (13), and 401(m)(11) are deemed not to be top heavy. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Tom Poje Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 but in this case deferral is only 3 months and the safe harbor is 1 year, so that is the exception to top heavy free in a safe harbor plan.
ETA Consulting LLC Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 Yes, 'solely funded' isn't the only requirement. All amounts must be under the written safe harbor arrangement. In this case, you can defer after 3 months; and that provision is not under the safe harbor arrangement; even though you're exempt from ADP testing. This would apply even if there aren't any early entrants to defer after 3 months. Good Luck! CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
401_noob Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 Slide 76 on page 38 of the ASPPA Top Heavy presentation confirms Tom and ETA's statement. https://www.asppa.org/Portals/2/06-11-14 Presentation.pdf
BG5150 Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 3 hours ago, Tom Poje said: but in this case deferral is only 3 months and the safe harbor is 1 year, so that is the exception to top heavy free in a safe harbor plan. missed that piece... QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Tom Poje Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 now you are beginning to get bad like I do and sometimes missing stuff when reading the question! trying to get to that magic 3000 posts? I think Dave gives out 3000 hit club T-shirts for that, but only if you are on his 'good' list. Dave Baker 1
BG5150 Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 I probably have 2,500 good posts. The others would be silly ones, or dumb ones like my first one in this thread. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Earl Posted July 12, 2018 Author Posted July 12, 2018 Dammit! I wrote it wrong. I apologize and hope someone has time to respond to the correction: Plan has 21 & 12 for PS but 3 months for 401k & SH Match If the owner gets Profit Sharing does that eliminate the SH/TH exemption for the OE component plan? (So the OE employees will need to get TH min if SH is less than 3% of pay) Thank you CBW
Mr Bagwell Posted July 12, 2018 Posted July 12, 2018 Earl, You are still in the same boat as original post. In a Top Heavy safe harbor plan, the Top Heavy rules kick in when a profit sharing contribution is to be done. No exemption if plan wants a PS contribution.
Earl Posted July 13, 2018 Author Posted July 13, 2018 ok, so the two component plans are aggregated for TH. Thanks CBW
BG5150 Posted July 13, 2018 Posted July 13, 2018 Is the owner the only non-excludable participant? All the others have less than a YOS or are under 21? QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
shERPA Posted July 13, 2018 Posted July 13, 2018 No OE exclusion for TH purposes. Dual eligibility is a trap for TH 401(k) plans. Just say no. Bill Presson 1 I carry stuff uphill for others who get all the glory.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now