Santo Gold Posted April 11, 2019 Posted April 11, 2019 If an employer wants to allow for after-tax employee contributions, then those contributions are tested in the ACP test. If the plan operates as a safe harbor match, does that mean that ACP test passes the inclusive of the after-tax employee contributions? Thanks
C. B. Zeller Posted April 11, 2019 Posted April 11, 2019 You can do the ACP test either on just the after-tax employee contributions, or on the after-tax contributions plus the match. Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
bmore1147 Posted April 11, 2019 Posted April 11, 2019 the plan must pass ACP if they are making voluntary after-tax contributions- having a Safe Harbor Match does not automatically satisfy the ACP if you are making After-Tax
Luke Bailey Posted April 11, 2019 Posted April 11, 2019 Re C. B. Zeller's point, it's in 1.401(m)-2(a)(5)(iv). Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
stxman Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 What would this do to top heavy requirements? As an example, a safe harbor plan with 5 participants composed of 3 owners and 2 employees, all of which are HCEs. The owners and 1 employee defer to get full company match of 4%, but 1 employee defers nothing, gets no company match. If the plan was amended to allow after tax 401k contributions and this feature was used, I understand it would still pass ADP/ACP (because there are no NHCEs), but would lose its TH protections. Would there be a mandatory 3% TH employer contribution to the non-deferring HCE?
Lou S. Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 Yes you lose the "get out of TH free card" so you need to satisfy TH minimum.
david rigby Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, stxman said: … 5 participants composed of 3 owners and 2 employees, all of which are HCEs. Don't you first have to determine Key vs. Non-Key? I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
stxman Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 Just now, david rigby said: Don't you first have to determine Key vs. Non-Key? Sorry for not making that explicit. Each owner is 1/3 equity holder, so key. The 2 employees have zero equity, aren't officers, etc so I am assuming they are both non-key. That said, if the TH minimum must be met for the 1 non-participating, non-key employee, could a profit share contribution be used to cover that?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now