Flyboyjohn Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 I've discovered hiding in plain sight a VCP correction for a SIMPLE IRA maintained by an employer who became an ineligible employer by exceeding the 100 employee limit in 2 prior years. The correction appears to allow the contributions to stay in the SIMPLE IRA accounts but also appears to require an additional sanction of at least 10% of the "excess amounts" plus loss of the employer deduction for the "excess amounts." My question is what are the "excess amounts"? If none of the contributions exceeded the employee deferral limits or the employer contribution limits does that mean we have no "excess amounts" and no additional sanction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Just a guess but I'd think the excess amounts are all the contributions that shouldn't have been made due to being an ineligible employer. Ed Snyder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justanotheradmin Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 3 hours ago, Flyboyjohn said: My question is what are the "excess amounts"? If none of the contributions exceeded the employee deferral limits or the employer contribution limits does that mean we have no "excess amounts" and no additional sanction? From Rev Proc 2019-19, page 45. (emphasis added) "(5) Treatment of Excess Amounts under a SEP or a SIMPLE IRA Plan. (a) Distribution of Excess Amounts. For purposes of this section 6.11, an Excess Amount is an amount contributed on behalf of an employee that is in excess of an employee’s benefit under the plan, or an elective deferral in excess of the limitations of § 402(g) or 408(k)(6)(A)(iii). If an Excess Amount is attributable to elective deferrals, the Plan Sponsor may effect distribution of the Excess Amount, adjusted for Earnings through the date of correction, to the affected participant. The amount distributed to the affected participant is includible in gross income in the year of distribution. The distribution is reported on Form 1099-R for the year of distribution with respect to each participant receiving the distribution. In addition, the Plan Sponsor must inform affected participants that the distribution of an Excess Amount is not eligible for favorable tax treatment accorded to distributions from a SEP or a SIMPLE IRA Plan (and, specifically, is not eligible for tax-free rollover). If the Excess Amount is attributable to employer contributions, the Plan Sponsor may effect distribution of the employer Excess Amount, adjusted for Earnings through the date of correction, to the Plan Sponsor. The amount distributed to the Plan Sponsor is not includible in the gross income of the affected participant. The Plan Sponsor is not entitled to a deduction for such employer Excess Amount. The distribution is reported on Form 1099-R issued to the participant indicating the taxable amount as zero." To me, the excess amount failures describe above in Section 6.11 are separate and distinct from the employer eligibility failure described in Section 4.06 and Section 6.03, though like everything else they may be related or coincide with each other. I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyboyjohn Posted April 24, 2019 Author Share Posted April 24, 2019 So if amounts contributed during an employer eligibility failure (if within legal limits) are NOT excess amounts then the only adverse ramification is the IRS user fee and the cost of preparing the VCP application. This could be particularly helpful in a situation where the employer wants to change from a SIMPLE IRA to a 401(k) mid-year since the cost of "blowing up" the SIMPLE IRA is relatively modest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 Looking at it more carefully (actually looking at it at all) I tend to agree. The proposed correction is simply to stop making contributions. Ed Snyder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Bailey Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 To confirm, I had one of these five or six years ago. Related companies with SIMPLE IRAs were acquired, and acquirer due diligence turned up that were a controlled group and had exceeded 100 employees for several years. Was surprised when I worked through whatever was the then-current EPCRS Rev. Proc. that the fix was simply to stop contributing. Had to do VCP, though, but was a simple filing. No bad tax results, no penalties. Etc. Employees just kept their IRAs. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now