Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Plan requires 2 years of service to be eligible for the PS component.  Therefore 100% vesting required. Plan is 401(k) Plan.

If the Employer does not want to make a Profit Sharing contribution, but a TH is required, can the TH contribution be on a vesting schedule?

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

Why?

The document says there must be an Employer contribution?  It doesn't say it has to be a match or non-elective?

 

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

I don't know how you do it administratively (system-wise that is) because in our world TH mins get built into PS but yeah, I think you could say "no PS this year" and then just have the TH as a stand-alone...on a different schedule with vesting over time - of course that should be in the document already.

Ed Snyder

Posted

It could certainly be done by having two separate plans - a 401(k), that provides the TH minimum and has a vesting schedule, and a separate PS plan that has 2-year eligibility and 100% immediate vesting.

Whether it could be done in one plan depends on what the document says. For example, the FT William doc that we use says that the top heavy vesting schedule will only apply to the extent it is more favorable than the plan's regular vesting schedule. That language would seem to preclude doing this in a single plan.

Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance.

Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA
Preferred Pension Planning Corp.
corey@pppc.co

Posted
20 minutes ago, C. B. Zeller said:

the FT William doc that we use says that the top heavy vesting schedule will only apply to the extent it is more favorable than the plan's regular vesting schedule.

Good point.  We use FTW and while I did do a quick look at the AA section, I didn't go to the BPD where this is found.  

Ed Snyder

Posted
14 hours ago, BG5150 said:

Plan requires 2 years of service to be eligible for the PS component.  Therefore 100% vesting required. Plan is 401(k) Plan.

If the Employer does not want to make a Profit Sharing contribution, but a TH is required, can the TH contribution be on a vesting schedule?

But participants would be eligible for top-heavy after one year?

Luke Bailey

Senior Counsel

Clark Hill PLC

214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com

2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600

Frisco, TX 75034

Posted

Unless the safe harbor top-heavy exemption applies, once they are eligible to defer and the plan is top-heavy, then the non-key employees must get a top-heavy minimum allocation, even if they are not yet eligible for profit sharing, match, and even if they don’t defer. Since the plan allows deferrals and can’t require more than a 1 YOS requirement for deferral eligibility, they have to provide the top-heavy before they’ve met the 2-year eligibility requirement for the PS portion of the plan. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use